liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Competing innovationsystems and the need for redeployment in sustainability transitions
Linköping University, Department of Management and Engineering, Project Innovations and Entrepreneurship. Linköping University, Faculty of Science & Engineering. (BRC)ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3164-6352
Linköping University, Department of Management and Engineering, Project Innovations and Entrepreneurship. Linköping University, Faculty of Science & Engineering. (Kite)ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4233-5138
2017 (English)In: Technological forecasting & social change, ISSN 0040-1625, E-ISSN 1873-5509Article in journal (Refereed) Epub ahead of print
Abstract [en]

According to sustainability transitions theories, innovation policies should create protective spaces (‘niches’) for promising new technologies. Moreover they should support a cumulative process of market formation and growth. Based on results from comparative case studies of two competing technological innovation systems for heavy transport (biogas and electrification), this paper argues that these recommendations are contradictory when technology alternatives with different degrees of maturity compete for the same niche. Should innovation policies open up the niche for the promising but immature alternative, or should they continue to support the technology that already has attained a niche position? If this contradiction remains unsolved, there is a risk for conflicts that block the progress of both alternatives. The paper suggests that there is a need for differentiated policies to resolve the contraction. In order to facilitate further development of both systems, the paper suggests that niche nurturing for immature systems needs to be combined with redeployment into new market segments for more mature systems. 

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier, 2017.
Keyword [en]
Technological innovation system; strategic niche management; technology competition; system redeployment; market formation; niche accumulation
National Category
Social Sciences Interdisciplinary
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-141195DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2017.08.014Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85029231428OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-141195DiVA: diva2:1144411
Projects
Miljöbuss, BRC
Funder
VINNOVA, 2015-03536
Available from: 2017-09-26 Created: 2017-09-26 Last updated: 2017-10-05Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

The full text will be freely available from 2019-09-24 12:47
Available from 2019-09-24 12:47

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Magnusson, ThomasBerggren, Christian
By organisation
Project Innovations and EntrepreneurshipFaculty of Science & Engineering
In the same journal
Technological forecasting & social change
Social Sciences Interdisciplinary

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

Altmetric score

Total: 12 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf