liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Internet-based vs. face-to-face cognitive behavior therapy for psychiatric and somatic disorders: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis
Department of Psychology, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.
Linköping University, Department of Behavioural Sciences and Learning, Psychology. Linköping University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences. (Internet, health and clinical psychology research group)ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4753-6745
Department of Clinical, Neuro and Developmental Psychology, Section of Clinical Psychology, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Department of Clinical, Neuro and Developmental Psychology, Section of Clinical Psychology, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; VU University Medical Centre/GGZ inGeest, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Faculty of Health Science, Telepsychiatric Unit, University of Southern Denmark, University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Show others and affiliations
2018 (English)In: Cognitive Behaviour Therapy, ISSN 1650-6073, E-ISSN 1651-2316, Vol. 47, no 1, p. 1-18Article, review/survey (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

During the last two decades, Internet-delivered cognitive behavior therapy (ICBT) has been tested in hundreds of randomized controlled trials, often with promising results. However, the control groups were often waitlisted, care-as-usual or attention control. Hence, little is known about the relative efficacy of ICBT as compared to face-to-face cognitive behavior therapy (CBT). In the present systematic review and meta-analysis, which included 1418 participants, guided ICBT for psychiatric and somatic conditions were directly compared to face-to-face CBT within the same trial. Out of the 2078 articles screened, a total of 20 studies met all inclusion criteria. Results showed a pooled effect size at post-treatment of Hedges g = .05 (95% CI, -.09 to .20), indicating that ICBT and face-to-face treatment produced equivalent overall effects. Study quality did not affect outcomes. While the overall results indicate equivalence, there have been few studies of the individual psychiatric and somatic conditions so far, and for the majority, guided ICBT has not been compared against face-to-face treatment. Thus, more research, preferably with larger sample sizes, is needed to establish the general equivalence of the two treatment formats.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Routledge, 2018. Vol. 47, no 1, p. 1-18
Keyword [en]
Guided internet-delivered cognitive behavior therapy, anxiety and mood disorders, face-to-face therapy, meta-analysis, somatic disorders
National Category
Applied Psychology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-143848DOI: 10.1080/16506073.2017.1401115ISI: 000419952900001PubMedID: 29215315Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85037730265OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-143848DiVA, id: diva2:1168766
Available from: 2017-12-21 Created: 2017-12-21 Last updated: 2018-01-29Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records BETA

Andersson, Gerhard

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Andersson, Gerhard
By organisation
PsychologyFaculty of Arts and Sciences
In the same journal
Cognitive Behaviour Therapy
Applied Psychology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 68 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf