liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Ethical dilemmas among psychologists in Sweden and South Africa
Linköping University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences, Department of Behavioural Sciences and Learning.
Linköping University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences, Department of Behavioural Sciences and Learning.
2008 (English)Independent thesis Advanced level (degree of Magister), 20 points / 30 hpStudent thesis
Abstract [en]

The purpose of this study is to investigate ethical dilemmas and ethical difficulties experienced by psychologists in Sweden and South Africa. The study is a replication of previous studies conducted by Colnerud (1997) and Slack and Wassenaar (1999). A sample of 295 psychologists in Sweden and 312 psychologists in South Africa were asked to describe situations that they identified as ethically difficult. 53 psychologists in Sweden described 61 incidents and 21 psychologists in South Africa described 24 situations. This corresponds to a response rate of 20% in Sweden and 8% in South Africa. The reported dilemmas were categorized according to a qualitative content analysis developed by Pope and Vetter (1992). The contribution of this study is that the results confirm that confidentiality is a prominent ethical dilemma for psychologists in Sweden and South Africa. This finding is consistent with findings in comprehensive international research. Furthermore, the results indicate that psychologists, especially in Sweden, experience ethical problems due to weakened legitimacy when conducting assessments. The results are discussed taking into consideration the different contexts in which psychologists work, the application of different ethics codes and different levels of ethical awareness. The weaknesses of the study and the method used are also discussed.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2008. , 50 p.
Keyword
Ethical dilemmas, ethical difficulties, professional ethics, ethics, codes of ethics, content analysis, confidentiality, professional psychologists
National Category
Psychology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-15386ISRN: LIU-IBL/PY-D--08/204--SEOAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-15384DiVA: diva2:117336
Presentation
(Swedish)
Uppsok
samhälle/juridik
Supervisors
Examiners
Available from: 2008-11-26 Created: 2008-11-05 Last updated: 2008-11-26Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(0 kB)5790 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 0 kBChecksum SHA-512
7416e0f453f0b6bf227b1503851df5b7c5f7c0e15a1fb2a12dc905cb729d9d1d82808c1226857db4ced3ede9836628b214df79fce32e9f7162ec86c8df32f71f
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Lindén, EllenRådeström, Johanna
By organisation
Department of Behavioural Sciences and Learning
Psychology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 5790 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 518 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf