liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Patient demographic and surgical characteristics in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a description of registries from six countries
Kaiser Permanente, CA 92108 USA.
Aarhus Univ Hosp, Denmark.
Clin Eich Ctr Hosp Luxembourg, Luxembourg.
Oslo Univ Hosp, Norway; Haukeland Hosp, Norway.
Show others and affiliations
2018 (English)In: British Journal of Sports Medicine, ISSN 0306-3674, E-ISSN 1473-0480, Vol. 52, no 11, article id 716Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Objective Findings from individual anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) registry studies are impactful, but how various registries from different countries compare with different patient populations and surgical techniques has not been described. We sought to describe six ACLR registry cohorts to understand variation across countries. Methods Five European registries and one US registry participated. For each registry, all primary ACLR registered between registry establishment through 31December 2014 were identified. Descriptive statistics included frequencies, proportions, medians and IQRs. Revision incidence rates following primary ACLR were computed. Results 101 125 ACLR were included: 21820 in Denmark, 300 in Luxembourg, 17556 in Norway, 30422 in Sweden, 2972 in the UK and 28055 in the US. In all six cohorts, males (range: 56.8%-72.4%) and soccer injuries (range: 14.1%-42.3%) were most common. European countries mostly used autografts (range: 93.7%-99.7%); allograft was most common in the US (39.9%). Interference screw was the most frequent femoral fixation in Luxembourg and the US (84.8% and 42.9%), and suspensory fixation was more frequent in the other countries (range: 43.9%-75.5%). Interference was the most frequent tibial fixation type in all six cohorts (range: 64.8%-98.2%). Three-year cumulative revision probabilities ranged from 2.8% to 3.7%. Conclusions Similarities in patient demographics and injury activity were observed between all cohorts of ACLR. However, graft and fixation choices differed. Revision rates were low. This work, including amp;gt;100 000 ACLR, is the most comprehensive international description of contemporary practice to date.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP , 2018. Vol. 52, no 11, article id 716
Keywords [en]
knee acl; epidemiology
National Category
Orthopaedics
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-148642DOI: 10.1136/bjsports-2017-098674ISI: 000433231900005PubMedID: 29574451OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-148642DiVA, id: diva2:1220027
Available from: 2018-06-18 Created: 2018-06-18 Last updated: 2018-06-18

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Magnusson, Henrik
By organisation
Division of PhysiotherapyFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences
In the same journal
British Journal of Sports Medicine
Orthopaedics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 101 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf