liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Annual burning of semi-natural grasslands for conservation favours tall-grown species with high nectar production
Linköping University, Department of Physics, Chemistry and Biology, Biology. Linköping University, Faculty of Science & Engineering.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-6128-1051
Swedish Univ Agr Sci, Sweden.
Linköping University, Department of Physics, Chemistry and Biology, Biology. Linköping University, Faculty of Science & Engineering.
Linköping University, Department of Physics, Chemistry and Biology, Theoretical Biology. Linköping University, Faculty of Science & Engineering.
2018 (English)In: Nordic Journal of Botany, ISSN 0107-055X, E-ISSN 1756-1051, Vol. 36, no 5, article id UNSP e01709Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Species-rich semi-natural grasslands in Europe are a main target for conservation efforts, and alternative methods to the traditional management of mowing or grazing would be welcome due to the difficulties in maintaining traditional management practices. One such method proposed is burning of grassland vegetation during late winter or spring. To evaluate the effects of annual spring burning vs annual mowing on semi-natural grassland vegetation, we compared the frequency of species in eleven field experiments in southern Sweden after ca 14 years. Out of the 88 species analyzed, five were more frequent in burnt plots compared with mowed plots (Vicia cracca, Cirsium arvense, Urtica dioica, Galium verum, Convallaria majalis). In contrast, 37 species were significantly less frequent in burnt plots compared with mowed ones, those with the largest differences being Ranunculus acris, Briza media, Veronica chamaedrys, Festuca ovina, Plantago lanceolata and Anthoxanthum odoratum. Tall-grown species and those with preferences for N-rich soils increased in frequency under an annual spring-burn regime, compared with annual mowing, as did species producing larger amounts of nectar. Hence, although vegetation composition becomes more trivial with annual spring burns, there might be long-term benefits for nectar-feeding insects.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
WILEY , 2018. Vol. 36, no 5, article id UNSP e01709
Keywords [en]
annual burning; management; mowing; semi-natural grassland; nectar production
National Category
Ecology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-149385DOI: 10.1111/njb.01709ISI: 000434153500005OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-149385DiVA, id: diva2:1229725
Note

Funding Agencies|Swedish Environmental Protection Agency; Swedish Board of Agriculture

Available from: 2018-07-02 Created: 2018-07-02 Last updated: 2018-08-03

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(590 kB)388 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT02.pdfFile size 590 kBChecksum SHA-512
82f624baf1385712d097d50ee61e5b4e8be62f59ee670125e1929c3a51248e75d6b30b114888d640b9daec485e749112689ab6a9563366a1a4dcdd22ba365043
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Milberg, PerWesterberg, LarsTälle, Malin
By organisation
BiologyFaculty of Science & EngineeringTheoretical Biology
In the same journal
Nordic Journal of Botany
Ecology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 388 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 335 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf