Validation of the Swedish version of Quality of Recovery score-15: a multicentre, cohort study
2018 (English)In: Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, ISSN 0001-5172, E-ISSN 1399-6576, Vol. 62, no 7, p. 893-902Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]
BackgroundQuality of recovery (QoR) after surgery is often focused on morbidity, mortality and physiological changes, while well-being and emotional state are other important aspects that are often ignored. QoR is poorly investigated in clinical settings and a psychometrically tested questionnaire, QoR-15, has recently been developed. QoR-15 has not been validated for Swedish conditions. The aim of this study was to translate, adapt and validate QoR-15 to Swedish conditions (QoR-15swe). MethodsA translation and cultural adaption was performed resulting in a Swedish version of the instrument, QoR-15swe. Patients answered the QoR-15swe before surgery, 24 and 48h after surgery. Feasibility, validity, reliability and responsiveness of the QoR-15swe were evaluated. ResultsThe QoR-15swe was feasible in 85.5% of the eligible patients. Construct validity was good, with significant correlations between QoR-15swe score and, ASA-PS class, grade of surgery, length of surgery and time in the post-anaesthesia care unit. The instrument demonstrated good internal consistency with an inter-item Cronbachs of 0.83-0.87, and inter-dimension Cronbachs was acceptable 0.71-0.76. Test-retest repeatability was also good with Cronbachs alpha amp;gt;0.99 and an interclass correlation coefficient of 0.992 (CI: 0.981-0.997). There were no floor and ceiling effects. Responsiveness assessed by Cliffs effect size was -0.23 indicating a moderate ability to detect change at 24h postoperatively. ConclusionWe have translated and culturally adapted the QoR-15 into Swedish. The score demonstrated acceptable validity, reliability and responsiveness. The QoR-15swe is a clinically acceptable and feasible outcome measure after surgery in a Swedish population.
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
WILEY , 2018. Vol. 62, no 7, p. 893-902
National Category
Surgery
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-149836DOI: 10.1111/aas.13086ISI: 000437726500004PubMedID: 29417552OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-149836DiVA, id: diva2:1236461
Note
Funding Agencies|Sinnescentrum, Ostergotland County Council, Sweden; Centre for Clinical Research Sormland, Uppsala University, Eskilstuna, Sweden
2018-08-022018-08-022019-09-19