liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Impact of SNR, masker type and noise reduction processing on sentence recognition performance and listening effort as indicated by the pupil dilation response
Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Netherlands; Amsterdam Publ Hlth Res Inst, Netherlands; Oticon AS, Denmark.
Oticon AS, Denmark; Tech Univ Denmark, Denmark.
Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Netherlands; Amsterdam Publ Hlth Res Inst, Netherlands.
MRC CSO Inst Hearing Res, Scotland; Univ Nottingham, England.
Show others and affiliations
2018 (English)In: Hearing Research, ISSN 0378-5955, E-ISSN 1878-5891, Vol. 365, p. 90-99Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Recent studies have shown that activating the noise reduction scheme in hearing aids results in a smaller peak pupil dilation (PPD), indicating reduced listening effort, at 50% and 95% correct sentence recognition with a 4-talker masker. The objective of this study was to measure the effect of the noise reduction scheme (on or off) on PPD and sentence recognition across a wide range of signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) from +16 dB to -12 dB and two masker types (4-talker and stationary noise). Relatively low PPDs were observed at very low (-12 dB) and very high (+16 dB to +8 dB) SNRs presumably due to giving up and easy listening, respectively. The maximum PPD was observed with SNRs at approximately 50% correct sentence recognition. Sentence recognition with both masker types was significantly improved by the noise reduction scheme, which corresponds to the shift in performance from SNR function at approximately 5 dB toward a lower SNR. This intelligibility effect was accompanied by a corresponding effect on the PPD, shifting the peak by approximately 4 dB toward a lower SNR. In addition, with the 4-talker masker, when the noise reduction scheme was active, the PPD was smaller overall than that when the scheme was inactive. We conclude that with the 4-talker masker, noise reduction scheme processing provides a listening effort benefit in addition to any effect associated with improved intelligibility. Thus, the effect of the noise reduction scheme on listening effort incorporates more than can be explained by intelligibility alone, emphasizing the potential importance of measuring listening effort in addition to traditional speech reception measures. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV , 2018. Vol. 365, p. 90-99
Keywords [en]
Hearing impairment; Speech recognition; Noise reduction scheme; Hearing aids; Pupil dilation; Listening effort; Signal-to-noise ratio
National Category
Otorhinolaryngology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-150234DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2018.05.003ISI: 000439671900008PubMedID: 29779607OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-150234DiVA, id: diva2:1240724
Note

Funding Agencies|European Commission [FP7-LISTEN607373]; Oticon Foundation

Available from: 2018-08-22 Created: 2018-08-22 Last updated: 2019-06-27

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Zekveld, AdrianaLunner, Thomas
By organisation
Department of Behavioural Sciences and LearningFaculty of Arts and SciencesThe Swedish Institute for Disability ResearchDisability Research
In the same journal
Hearing Research
Otorhinolaryngology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 14 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf