liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
ESPI analysis of crack face displacements in damaged laminates
Division of Materials Science, Luleå University of Technology, Luleå, Sweden.
Institut Jean Lamour, University of Lorraine, EEIGM, Nancy, France.
Division of Materials Science, Luleå University of Technology, Luleå, Sweden.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-9649-8621
2014 (English)In: Composites Science And Technology, ISSN 0266-3538, E-ISSN 1879-1050, Vol. 94, p. 80-88Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Crack opening displacement (COD) and crack sliding displacement (CSD) are the two parameters that define slope of stiffness reduction with increasing crack density. The values of these parameters strongly depend on the crack geometry which is difficult to observe and quantify. In models we usually assume straight crack, no local delaminations (questionable for surface cracks) and use uniform spacing. In this paper COD of cracks in surface layers are analyzed using the displacement field on the edge and on the surface of a [90/0]s and [903/0]s carbon fiber/epoxy laminates subjected to tension. The specimen full-field displacement measurement is carried out using ESPI (Electronic Speckle Pattern Interferometry). It is shown that including in the FEM model crack locations exactly as in the test, the COD of an individual crack is predicted accurately. The model with periodic and symmetric crack distribution significantly underestimates the COD whereas staggered crack distribution model in many cases renders very good results. Crack face sliding displacements, CSD were measured on the edge of [0/704/-704]s GF/EP laminate, showing that the sliding can not be neglected and that the COD versus CSD ratio for this laminate is similar to model predictions.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier, 2014. Vol. 94, p. 80-88
Keywords [en]
Laminate, Matrix cracking, Damage mechanics, Non-destructive testing
National Category
Composite Science and Engineering
Research subject
Polymeric Composite Materials
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-150432DOI: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2014.01.005ISI: 000334822100011Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-84893954710Local ID: 8ba976c9-8767-4293-bfe0-cad91b31cb71OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-150432DiVA, id: diva2:1241328
Note

Validerad; 2014; 20140114 (andbra)

Available from: 2016-09-29 Created: 2018-08-23

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Loukil, Mohamed SahbiVarna, Janis

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Loukil, Mohamed SahbiVarna, Janis
In the same journal
Composites Science And Technology
Composite Science and Engineering

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 26 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf