liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Managing blame in NHS weight management treatment: Psychologising weight and ‘obesity’
Department of Psychology, University of Strathclyde, Graham Hills Building, Glasgow, UK.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3307-0748
2009 (English)In: Journal of Community and Applied Social Phychology, ISSN 1052-9284, E-ISSN 1099-1298, Vol. 19, no 5, p. 374-387Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Weight management services in the UK's National Health Service (NHS) are on the increase, partly due to rising rates of patients classified as ‘obese’. Those attending such services are held accountable, on some level, for their weight, although this issue is rarely addressed in clinical research in this area. By contrast, critical social research on ‘obesity’ considers blame a prominent issue though has yet to examine this in situ, in interactions between patients and health professionals. This paper uses discursive psychology to examine how blame is managed in the turn‐by‐turn interaction in group meetings within NHS weight management treatment. The data corpus comprises of digital audio recordings of 27 discussion‐based group meetings between patients and practitioners in a specialist weight‐management service in central Scotland. The analysis focuses on those moments in which patients appear to resist the notion that they are responsible for their weight gain. Such moments are typically managed by patients in one of two ways: By denying having performed the blameworthy activity, or locating the blame as outside of individual control. Both strategies, however, rely on an individualistic concept of weight that reifies the medical model, while at the same time, troubling that model and its efficacy. The paper concludes with a consideration of the implications of these discursive practices and their relevance within the field.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
John Wiley & Sons, 2009. Vol. 19, no 5, p. 374-387
National Category
Psychology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-152149DOI: 10.1002/casp.1017OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-152149DiVA, id: diva2:1257139
Available from: 2018-10-19 Created: 2018-10-19 Last updated: 2018-10-22Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full text

Authority records BETA

Wiggins, Sally

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Wiggins, Sally
In the same journal
Journal of Community and Applied Social Phychology
Psychology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 8 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf