liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Exploring the Adult Learning Research Field by Analysing Who Cites Whom
Linköping University, Department of Behavioural Sciences and Learning, Education and Adult Learning. Linköping University, Faculty of Educational Sciences. (Vuxenpedagogik och Folkbildning)ORCID iD: 0000-0003-3241-0189
Linköping University, University Library.
Linköping University, Department of Behavioural Sciences and Learning, Education and Adult Learning. Linköping University, Faculty of Educational Sciences. (Vuxenpedagogik och Folkbildning)ORCID iD: 0000-0002-9916-8705
2019 (English)In: Mapping out the research field of adult education and learning / [ed] Andreas Fejes & Erik Nylander, Springer, 2019, 1, p. 55-72Chapter in book (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

In this article we report on findings from a large-scale bibliographic study conducted based on the citation practices within the field of research on adult learning. Our data consist of 151,261 citation links between more than 33,000 different authors whose papers were published in five leading international journals in the field of adult learning during the time period 2006–2014. By analysing the composition of the dominating citation clusters we are able to construct a telescopic view of the research field based on an accumulation of bibliographic citations. The results consist of two parts. First we go through the dominating players active in the field, their position and mutual relationship. Secondly, we derive two main structural oppositions inherent in the citation networks, one connected to the research object (studying education or work) and the second to the level of analysis (cognition or policy). We find that the most dominating tradition within adult learning the last few decades – socio- cultural perspectives on learning – occupies a very central position in the space of citations, balancing between these opposing poles. We hope that this analysis will help foster reflexivity concerning our own research practices, and will reveal the relations of dominance currently prevailing within the field of adult learning.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Springer, 2019, 1. p. 55-72
Series
Lifelong Learning Book Series ; 24
Keywords [en]
Adult education, bibliometrics, scientometrics, sociology of science
National Category
Pedagogy
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-157157DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-10946-2_4ISBN: 9783030109455 (print)ISBN: 9783030109462 (electronic)OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-157157DiVA, id: diva2:1319130
Available from: 2019-05-29 Created: 2019-05-29 Last updated: 2019-09-16Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full text

Authority records BETA

Nylander, ErikÖsterlund, LovisaFejes, Andreas

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Nylander, ErikÖsterlund, LovisaFejes, Andreas
By organisation
Education and Adult LearningFaculty of Educational SciencesUniversity Library
Pedagogy

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
isbn
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
isbn
urn-nbn
Total: 26 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf