liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Lightweight Authentication and Key Agreement for Smart Metering in Smart Energy Networks
University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Linköping University, Department of Computer and Information Science, Database and information techniques. Linköping University, Faculty of Science & Engineering. ITMO University, Saint Petersburg, Russian Federation.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-9829-9287
Dongseo University, South Korea.
University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Show others and affiliations
2019 (English)In: IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, ISSN 1949-3053, E-ISSN 1949-3061, Vol. 10, no 4, p. 4349-4359Article in journal, Editorial material (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Smart meters are considered as foundational part of the smart metering infrastructure (SMI) in smart energy networks. Smart meter is a digital device that makes use of twoway communication between consumer and utility to exchange, manage and control energy consumptions within a home. However, despite all the features, a smart meter raises several securityrelated concerns. For instance, how to exchange data between the legal entities (e.g., smart meter and utility server) while maintaining privacy of the consumer. To address these concerns, authentication and key agreement in SMI can provide important security properties that not only to maintain a trust between the legitimate entities but also to satisfy other security services. This work presents a lightweight authentication and key agreement (LAKA) that enables trust, anonymity, integrity and adequate security in the domain of smart energy network. The proposed scheme employs hybrid cryptography to facilitate mutual trust (authentication), dynamic session key, integrity, and anonymity. We justify the feasibility of the proposed scheme with a testbed using 802.15.4 based device (i.e., smart meter). Moreover, through the security and performance analysis, we show that the proposed scheme is more effective and energy efficient compared to the previous schemes.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE), 2019. Vol. 10, no 4, p. 4349-4359
Keywords [en]
Authentication, key agreement, smart metering infrastructure, smart energy networks
National Category
Electrical Engineering, Electronic Engineering, Information Engineering
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-157190DOI: 10.1109/TSG.2018.2857558ISI: 000472577500075Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85050178630OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-157190DiVA, id: diva2:1320184
Note

Funding agencies:  U.K. EPSRC (Security and Privacy in Smart Grid Systems: Countermeasure and Formal Verification) [EP/N020170/1]; Center for Industrial Informatics; Research Council of Norway through PREAPP Project [231746/F20]; Research Council of Norway through eX3 Proje

Available from: 2019-06-04 Created: 2019-06-04 Last updated: 2019-07-19Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records BETA

Gurtov, Andrei

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Gurtov, Andrei
By organisation
Database and information techniquesFaculty of Science & Engineering
In the same journal
IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid
Electrical Engineering, Electronic Engineering, Information Engineering

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 2 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf