liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Percutaneous Versus Transcutaneous Bone Conduction Implant System: A Feasibility Study on a Cadaver Head
Chalmers Unviversity.
Sahlgrens University Hospital.
Chalmers Unviversity.
Linköping University, Faculty of Health Sciences. Linköping University, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Technical Audiology.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-3350-8997
Show others and affiliations
2008 (English)In: Otology and Neurotology, ISSN 1531-7129, E-ISSN 1537-4505, Vol. 29, no 8, 1132-1139 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Objective: Percutaneous bone-anchored hearing aid (BAHA) is an important rehabilitation alternative for patients who have conductive or mixed hearing loss. However, these devices use a percutaneous and bone-anchored implant that has some drawbacks reported. A transcutaneous bone conduction implant system (BCI) is proposed as an alternative to the percutaneous system because it leaves the skin intact. The BCI transmits the signal to a permanently implanted transducer with an induction loop system through the intact skin. The aim of this study was to compare the electroacoustic performance of the BAHA Classic-300 with a full-scale BCI on a cadaver head in a sound field. The BCI comprised the audio processor of the vibrant sound bridge connected to a balanced vibration transducer (balanced electromagnetic separation transducer).

Methods: Implants with snap abutments were placed in the parietal bone (Classic-300) and 15-mm deep in the temporal bone (BCI). The vibration responses at the ipsilateral and contralateral cochlear promontories were measured with a laser Doppler vibrometer, with the beam aimed through the ear canal.

Results: Results show that the BCI produces approximately 5 dB higher maximum output level and has a slightly lower distortion than the Classic-300 at the ipsilateral promontorium at speech frequencies. At the contralateral promontorium, the maximum output level was considerably lower for the BCI than for the Classic-300 except in the 1-2 kHz range, where it was similar.

Conclusion: Present results support the proposal that a BCI system can be a realistic alternative to a BAHA.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2008. Vol. 29, no 8, 1132-1139 p.
Keyword [en]
Bone conduction, Hearing, Implant, Transcutaneous
National Category
Medical and Health Sciences
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-16205DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e31816fdc90OAI: diva2:133433
Available from: 2009-01-12 Created: 2009-01-09 Last updated: 2014-10-08

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Stenfelt, Stefan
By organisation
Faculty of Health SciencesTechnical Audiology
In the same journal
Otology and Neurotology
Medical and Health Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 42 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link