liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Survival after radiotherapy versus radical cystectomy for primary muscle-invasive bladder cancer: A Swedish nationwide population-based cohort study
Uppsala Univ, Sweden; Umea Univ, Sweden.
Kings Coll London, England; Reg Canc Ctr Uppsala Orebro, Sweden.
Umea Univ, Sweden.
Kings Coll London, England; Karolinska Inst, Sweden.
Show others and affiliations
2019 (English)In: Cancer Medicine, ISSN 2045-7634, E-ISSN 2045-7634, Vol. 8, no 5, p. 2196-2204Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background Studies of survival comparing radical cystectomy (RC) and radiotherapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer have provided inconsistent results and have methodological limitations. The aim of the study was to investigate risk of death after radiotherapy as compared to RC. Methods We selected patients with muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma without distant metastases, treated with radiotherapy or RC from 1997 to 2014 in the Bladder Cancer Data Base Sweden (BladderBaSe) and estimated absolute and relative risk of bladder cancer death and all-cause death. In a group of patients, theoretically eligible for a trial comparing radiotherapy and RC, we calculated risk difference in an instrumental variable analysis. We have not investigated chemoradiotherapy as this treatment was not used in the study time period. Results The study included 3 309 patients, of those 17% were treated with radiotherapy and 83% with RC. Patients treated with radiotherapy were older, had more advanced comorbidity, and had a higher risk of death as compared to patients treated with RC (relative risks of 1.5-1.6). In the "trial population," all-cause death risk difference was 6 per 100 patients lower after radiotherapy at 5 years of follow-up, 95% confidence interval -41 to 29. Conclusion(s) Patient selection between the treatments make it difficult to evaluate results from conventionally adjusted and propensity-score matched survival analysis. When taking into account unmeasured confounding by instrumental variable analysis, no differences in survival was found between the treatments for a selected group of patients. Further clinical studies are needed to characterize this group of patients, which can serve as a basis for future comparison studies for treatment recommendations.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
WILEY , 2019. Vol. 8, no 5, p. 2196-2204
Keywords [en]
bladder cancer; muscle-invasive; radical cystectomy; radiotherapy; urothelial carcinoma
National Category
Cancer and Oncology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-158578DOI: 10.1002/cam4.2126ISI: 000469272500024PubMedID: 30938068OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-158578DiVA, id: diva2:1334867
Note

Funding Agencies|Swedish Cancer Society [CAN 2013/472]

Available from: 2019-07-03 Created: 2019-07-03 Last updated: 2019-07-03

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Aljabery, FirasJahnson, Staffan
By organisation
Department of Clinical and Experimental MedicineFaculty of Medicine and Health SciencesDepartment of Urology in ÖstergötlandDivision of Surgery, Orthopedics and Oncology
In the same journal
Cancer Medicine
Cancer and Oncology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 5 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf