liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
One third of patients with radiotherapy-induced nausea consider their antiemetic treatment insufficient
Linköping University, Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Nursing Science. Linköping University, Faculty of Health Sciences. Vårdal Institute, Lund, Sweden; .
Department of Oncology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Department of Oncology, Division of Clinical Cancer Epidemiology, Sahlgrenska Academy, Gothenburg, Sweden; Department of Oncology and Pathology, Division of Clinical Cancer Epidemiology, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
Linköping University, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Obstetrics and gynecology. Linköping University, Faculty of Health Sciences. Östergötlands Läns Landsting, Center of Paediatrics and Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics in Linköping.
Show others and affiliations
2009 (English)In: Supportive Care in Cancer, ISSN 0941-4355, E-ISSN 1433-7339, Vol. 17, no 1, 23-32 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Objective: To describe the prevalence of nausea and vomiting during radiotherapy and to compare quality of life, psychological and functional status in patients experiencing or not experiencing nausea.

Materials and methods: A cross-sectional selection of 368 cancer patients treated with radiotherapy answered a questionnaire (=93% answering rate) regarding nausea, vomiting, actual use of and interest in antiemetic treatment, quality of life and psychological and functional status during the preceding week of radiotherapy. Mean age was 60 years and 66% were women.

Main results: Nausea was experienced by 39% ( 145) and vomiting by 7% ( 28) of patients in general, by 63% in abdominal or pelvic fields and by 48% in head/neck/brain fields. Abdominal/pelvic field (Relative risk (RR) 2.0), age <= 40 years (RR 1.9) and previous nausea in other situations (RR 1.8) implied an increased risk for nausea. Antiemetics were used by 17% and 78% were interested in or wanted more information about acupuncture treatment against nausea. Of the 145 nauseous patients only 25% felt that antiemetics had helped them and 34% would have liked additional treatment, although the nausea intensity was mild in 72%. The nauseous patients reported lower well-being and quality of life, lower satisfaction with aspects of daily living and more frequent anxiety and depressed mood than the patients without nausea.

Conclusions: Of all patients undergoing radiotherapy, 39% experienced nausea and one third of them would have liked more treatment against the nausea. This study stresses the importance to identify and adequately treat patients with increased risk for nausea related to radiotherapy.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Springer, 2009. Vol. 17, no 1, 23-32 p.
Keyword [en]
Antiemetics, Daily living, Risk factors, Vomiting, Quality of life
National Category
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-16236DOI: 10.1007/s00520-008-0445-xISI: 000261577400004PubMedID: 18528717ScopusID: 2-s2.0-57949084679OAI: diva2:133492
Available from: 2009-01-12 Created: 2009-01-09 Last updated: 2015-11-18Bibliographically approved
In thesis
1. Nausea and vomiting in patients receiving acupuncture, sham acupuncture or standard care during radiotherapy
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Nausea and vomiting in patients receiving acupuncture, sham acupuncture or standard care during radiotherapy
2008 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

Background and aim: Many patients with cancer experience emesis (nausea and vomiting) during radiotherapy. The overall aim of this thesis was to improve the situation for patients with risk for emesis during radiotherapy, by evaluating emesis in patients receiving verum (genuine) acupuncture, sham (simulated) acupuncture or standard care during radiotherapy.

Methods: In study I, a cross-sectional sample (n=368) treated with radiotherapy over various fields answered a study-specific questionnaire. In study II, 80 healthy volunteers were randomized to receive needling with verum acupuncture or non-penetrating telescopic sham needles by one of four physiotherapists. In study III, 215 patients were randomly allocated to verum (n=109) or non-penetrating telescopic sham (n=106) acupuncture during their entire radiotherapy period over abdominal or pelvic fields. The same 215 patients were also included in study IV. They were compared to 62 patients irradiated over abdominal or pelvic fields, selected from study I.

Results: In study I, the weekly prevalence of nausea was 39 % in all radiotherapy-treated patients and 63 % in abdominal or pelvic irradiated patients. Age younger than 40 years and previous experience of nausea in other situations were characteristics associated with an increased risk for nausea. Of the 145 nauseous patients, 34 % considered their antiemetic treatment as insufficient. Patients with nausea reported lower level of quality of life compared to patients free from nausea. In study II, most individuals needled with verum (68 %) or sham (68 %) acupuncture could not identify needling type, and that blinding result varied from 55 to 80 % between the four therapists. In study III, nausea was experienced by 70 % (mean number of days=10.1) and 25 % vomited during the radiotherapy period. In the sham group 62 % experienced nausea (mean number of days=8.7) and 28 % vomited. Ninety five percent in the verum and 96 % in the sham group believed that the treatment had been effective for nausea. In both groups, 67 % experienced other positive effects, on relaxation, mood, sleep or pain-reduction, and 89 % were interested in receiving the treatment again. In study IV, the weekly prevalence of nausea and vomiting was 38 and 8 % in the verum group, 37 and 7 % in the sham group and 63 and 15 % in the standard care group. The nausea difference between the acupuncture and the standard care cohort was statistically significant, also after overall adjustments for potential confounding factors. The nausea intensity in the acupuncture cohort was lower compared to the standard care cohort (p=0.002). Patients who expected nausea had increased risk for nausea compared to patients who expected low risk for nausea (Relative risk 1.6).

Conclusions and implications: Nausea was common during abdominal or pelvic field irradiation in patients receiving standard care. Verum acupuncture did not reduce emesis compared to sham acupuncture, while reduced emesis was seen in both patients treated with verum or sham acupuncture. Health-care professionals may consider identifying and treating patients with increased risk for nausea in advance. The telescopic sham needle was credible. Researchers may thus use and standardize the sham procedure in acupuncture control groups. The choice of performing acupuncture during radiotherapy cannot be based on arguments that the specific characters of verum acupuncture have effects on nausea. It is important to further study what components in the acupuncture procedures that produce the dramatic positive but yet not fully understood antiemetic effect, making it possible to use those components to further increase quality of care during radiotherapy.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Linköping: Linköping University Electronic Press, 2008. 69 p.
Linköping University Medical Dissertations, ISSN 0345-0082 ; 1088
Acupuncture, Cancer, Emesis, Placebo, Radiotherapy
National Category
Medical and Health Sciences
urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-17237 (URN)978-91-7393-754-2 (ISBN)
Public defence
2008-12-05, Berzeliussalen, Campus US, Linköpings universitet, Linköping, 13:00 (English)
Available from: 2009-03-12 Created: 2009-03-12 Last updated: 2013-09-03Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopusLink to Ph.D. Thesis

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Enblom, AnnaHammar, MatsBörjeson, Sussanne
By organisation
Nursing ScienceFaculty of Health SciencesObstetrics and gynecologyDepartment of Gynaecology and Obstetrics in LinköpingCentre of Surgery and Oncology
In the same journal
Supportive Care in Cancer

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 194 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link