liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Validation of the Acute Recovery and Stress Scale (ARSS) and the Short Recovery and Stress Scale (SRSS) in three English-speaking regions
Ruhr Univ Bochum, Germany; Stellenbosch Univ, South Africa.
Ruhr Univ Bochum, Germany.
Oxford Brookes Univ, England.
Australian Inst Sport, Australia; Univ Canberra, Australia; Edith Cowan Univ, Australia.
Show others and affiliations
2020 (English)In: Journal of Sports Sciences, ISSN 0264-0414, E-ISSN 1466-447X, Vol. 38, no 2, p. 130-139Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

The Acute Recovery and Stress Scale (ARSS) and the Short Recovery and Stress Scale (SRSS) are well-established monitoring tools in German-speaking countries. This study aimed at validating them for English-speaking populations. Overall, 996 athletes (536 males, 24.9 +/- 9.1 years) of Australia/New Zealand (n = 380), the United Kingdom (n = 316), and North America (n = 300) participated. The 32-item ARSS consists of eight scales. These scales constitute the eight items of the SRSS with the corresponding ARSS items as descriptors. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), internal consistency (alpha), and discriminatory power of the items (r(it)) were calculated for the total and subsamples separately. Satisfactory discriminatory power (r(it) amp;gt; .30) for all ARSS and SRSS items and acceptable internal consistency (alpha amp;gt; .70) was achieved. CFA indicated good fit indices for the total sample and subsamples, and strong measurement invariance was found across subsamples and gender. Correlations between corresponding scales and items (r(s) = .68 - .78) support theoretical congruency as well as independent usage of both questionnaires. Construct validity of both tools is shown through hypothesis-conforming correlations with the Recovery-Stress Questionnaire for Athletes. Future studies may apply the ARSS and SRSS as monitoring tools in English-speaking regions worldwide.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD , 2020. Vol. 38, no 2, p. 130-139
Keywords [en]
Monitoring; training; psychology; assessment; measurement invariance
National Category
Psychology (excluding Applied Psychology)
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-162320DOI: 10.1080/02640414.2019.1684790ISI: 000494913500001PubMedID: 31696778OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-162320DiVA, id: diva2:1374048
Available from: 2019-11-28 Created: 2019-11-28 Last updated: 2021-04-28

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Authority records

Raysmith, Benjamin P.

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Raysmith, Benjamin P.
By organisation
Division of Society and HealthFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences
In the same journal
Journal of Sports Sciences
Psychology (excluding Applied Psychology)

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 104 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf