liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Efficacy beliefs and interdependence when being assessed working in a group
Linköping University, Department of Behavioural Sciences and Learning, Education, Teaching and Learning. Linköping University, Faculty of Educational Sciences.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-1391-3346
Linköping University, Department of Behavioural Sciences and Learning, Psychology. Linköping University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-7117-5620
Linköping University, Department of Behavioural Sciences and Learning, Psychology. Linköping University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-0202-4650
2020 (English)In: Educational studies (Dorchester-on-Thames), ISSN 0305-5698, E-ISSN 1465-3400, p. 1-12Article in journal (Refereed) Epub ahead of print
Abstract [en]

The aim of this study was to investigate factors that can predict collective efficacy in student work groups year 5 and 8 at compulsory school and to see if there are gender and year differences for efficacy beliefs and aspects of interdependence. A total of 283 completed questionnaires were analysed. Hierarchical multiple regression was used to predict collective efficacy and 2 × 2 ANOVA was used to analyse gender and year differences and interactions for following five factors: collective efficacy, self-efficacy, negative interdependence, positive interdependence and importance of good assessment and marks. The result showed that independent of gender, year and school, self-efficacy, positive and negative interdependence predicted collective efficacy in connection with group work assessment. The result also showed that there were better conditions for cooperation in year 5 compared to year 8. Additionally, it was significantly more important for girls than boys to achieve good assessment and marks.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Taylor & Francis, 2020. p. 1-12
Keywords [en]
Collective-efficacy, self-efficacy, interdependence, group work, gender, group work assessment
National Category
Pedagogical Work
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-162896DOI: 10.1080/03055698.2019.1706039ISI: 000504194500001Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85077158947OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-162896DiVA, id: diva2:1381871
Projects
Bedömning av kunskap och förmåga vid grupparbete
Funder
Swedish Research Council, 721 2012-547
Note

Funding agencies:  Swedish Research CouncilSwedish Research Council [721 2012-5476]

Available from: 2019-12-29 Created: 2019-12-29 Last updated: 2020-01-17Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

Efficacy beliefs and interdependence when being assessed working in a group(1476 kB)20 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 1476 kBChecksum SHA-512
38c32f062bcc17e1390d02d825648e0e885fa518d7a95361822b19cfecb50e10949a683ff2379ffde3abde0d387bb3601c8af06176e5c018909d56d2eb1b85d1
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records BETA

Forslund Frykedal, KarinHammar Chiriac, EvaRosander, Michael

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Forslund Frykedal, KarinHammar Chiriac, EvaRosander, Michael
By organisation
Education, Teaching and LearningFaculty of Educational SciencesPsychologyFaculty of Arts and Sciences
In the same journal
Educational studies (Dorchester-on-Thames)
Pedagogical Work

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 20 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 50 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf