liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Fatigue scores correlate with other self-assessment data, but not with clinical and biomarker parameters, in CIS and RRMS
Linköping University, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Division of Neuro and Inflammation Science. Linköping University, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences. Region Östergötland, Local Health Care Services in Central Östergötland, Department of Neurology in Linköping.
Linköping University, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Divison of Neurobiology. Linköping University, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences.
Linköping University, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Division of Neuro and Inflammation Science. Linköping University, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences. Region Östergötland, Center for Diagnostics, Department of Clinical Immunology and Transfusion Medicine.
Linköping University, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Division of Neuro and Inflammation Science. Linköping University, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences. Region Östergötland, Local Health Care Services in Central Östergötland, Department of Neurology in Linköping.
Show others and affiliations
2019 (English)In: Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders, ISSN 2211-0348, E-ISSN 2211-0356, Vol. 36, article id UNSP 101424Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background: Fatigue is common in multiple sclerosis and is associated with reduced quality of life. This study aimed to assess the correlation between fatigue scores and data from other self-assessment questionnaires, neuropsychological tests and neuroimaging, as well as data on neuroimmunological markers in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and serum/plasma, in clinically isolated syndrome (CIS) and relapsing remitting MS (RRMS). Methods: Modified fatigue impact scale (MFIS) scores were determined in 38 patients with newly diagnosed CIS or RRMS at baseline and after one year in a prospective longitudinal cohort study. Non-parametric correlation analyses were used to assess associations between MFIS scores and other self-assessment questionnaire data (Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale (HAD), Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale 29 (MSIS-29) and Short Form 36 (SF-36)), as well as with neuropsychological test performances (e.g. Auditory Consonant Trigram Test (ACTT)), clinical parameters (e.g. disease duration and expanded disability status scale (EDSS)), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data (number of T2 lesions in brain MRI and total brain volume) and several neurodegenerative/neuroinflammatory markers in CSF and serum/plasma (IL-1 beta, IL-6, CXCL1, CXCL10, CXCL13, CCL-22 in plasma; neurofilament light chain (NFL) in serum; IL-6, CXCL1, CXCL10, CXCL13, CCL22, NFL and chitinase-3-like-1 (CHI3L1) in CSF. CSF and serum/plasma from 21 age- and sex-matched healthy controls were available for comparison. Results: At both baseline and one-year follow-up, fatigue scores correlated significantly with HAD, MSIS-29 and SF-36 scores and ACTT performance (Spearmans rho 0.45-0.78, all p amp;lt;= 0.01) but not with the other neuropsychological test results, disease duration, EDSS ratings, number of T2 lesions, total brain volume or neurodegenerative/neuroinflammatory markers, including neurofilament light chain levels in CSF and serum. In group comparisons, MFIS scores were similar in patients fulfilling no evidence of disease activity-3 (NEDA-3) (n = 18) and patients not fulfilling NEDA-3 (n = 20) during one year of follow-up (p amp;gt; 0.01). Conclusions: In this cohort of patients with newly diagnosed CIS and RRMS, fatigue scores were associated with mood, disease impact on daily life and quality of life as well as with alterations of attentive functions. Study results indicate that subjective fatigue scores are not well reflected by some commonly used and objectively measurable disease parameters like EDSS, T2 lesions and NFL levels.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
ELSEVIER SCI LTD , 2019. Vol. 36, article id UNSP 101424
Keywords [en]
Fatigue; Multiple sclerosis; Neuropsychology; Neurofilament light chain; Chemokine
National Category
Immunology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-163049DOI: 10.1016/j.msard.2019.101424ISI: 000502098900023PubMedID: 31586802OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-163049DiVA, id: diva2:1384239
Note

Funding Agencies|Swedish Research CouncilSwedish Research Council [K2013-61X-22310-01-4]; Medical Research Council of Southeast Sweden [FORSS-758461]; Neuro Sweden; University Hospital of Linkoping, Sweden

Available from: 2020-01-09 Created: 2020-01-09 Last updated: 2020-01-16
In thesis
1. Biomarkers and Disease Activity in Multiple Sclerosis: A cohort study on patients with clinically isolated syndrome and relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Biomarkers and Disease Activity in Multiple Sclerosis: A cohort study on patients with clinically isolated syndrome and relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis
2019 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

This thesis focuses on disease activity in clinically isolated syndrome (CIS) and newly diagnosed relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). The papers are based on data from 41 patients in a prospective longitudinal cohort study. All patients were untreated at baseline. Age- and sex-matched healthy controls (n=22) for blood and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) samples were recruited from blood donors.

Paper I evaluated the prognostic value of baseline levels of CXCL1, CXCL8, CXCL10, CXCL13, CCL22, neurofilament light chain (NFL), neurofilament heavy chain, glial fibrillary acidic protein, chitinase-3-like-1 (CHI3L1), matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9) and osteopontin in CSF in relation to disease activity during the first two years of follow-up. Disease activity was defined as clinical relapses, new T2 lesions in brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and/or sustained Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) progression. Absence of these three signs of disease activity was called no evidence of disease activity (NEDA-3). Logistic regression analysis showed that NFL in CSF was the best predictive marker of disease activity and correctly classified 93% of the patients with evidence of disease activity during two years of follow-up and 67% of those without.

Paper II presented four year follow-up data from the cohort and also included brain volume data as well as serum levels of NFL. The correlation between NFL in CSF and serum was fairly strong (r=0.74, p<0.001). NFL in CSF was associated with new T2 lesions as well as with brain volume loss, whereas CHI3L1 in CSF was associated mainly with brain volume loss and CXCL1, CXCL10, CXCL13, CCL22 and MMP-9 in CSF were mainly associated with new T2 lesions. Taken together, paper I and II confirm and extend the knowledge of NFL as a useful biomarker in CIS and RRMS and suggests that NFL, rather than total brain volume loss, could be included in an expanded NEDA concept and used in clinical monitoring of disease activity/treatment effect. Although serum levels of NFL were correlated with the corresponding CSF levels, CSF-NFL showed a stronger association to subsequent disease activity (NEDA-3).

Paper III addressed the patients´ self-reported Modified Fatigue Impact Scale (MFIS) scores in relation to other cohort study data. MFIS scores correlated with other self-assessment questionnaire data (Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale (HAD), Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale 29 (MSIS-29) and Short Form 36 (SF-36) scores (Spearman´s rho 0.45-0.78, all p≤0.01)) but not with EDSS ratings, number of T2 lesions, total brain volume or NFL levels, indicating that subjective fatigue scores are not well reflected by some commonly used and objectively measurable disease parameters.

Paper IV focused on the complement factors C1q, C3, C3a and sC5b-9 in CSF and plasma. CSFC1q was significantly higher in patients than in controls at baseline. The subgroup of patients with ongoing relapse at baseline also had higher levels of CSF-C3a than controls. Baseline levels of CSF-C1q and CSF-C3a correlated significantly with several pro-inflammatory chemokines as well as with MMP-9, CHI3L1 and NFL in CSF. Baseline CSF-C3a also correlated significantly with the number of T2 lesions and Gadolinium enhancing lesions in brain MRI at baseline, as well as with the number of new T2 lesions during follow-up. This study indicates that the complement system is involved already at early stages of MS. It also suggests that especially CSF-C1q and CSF-C3a levels are associated with other neuroinflammatory and neurodegenerative markers and that CSF-C3a levels may carry some prognostic information.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Linköping: Linköping University Electronic Press, 2019. p. 78
Series
Linköping University Medical Dissertations, ISSN 0345-0082 ; 1697
National Category
Neurology
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-160762 (URN)10.3384/diss.diva-160762 (DOI)9789176850121 (ISBN)
Public defence
2019-10-18, Berzeliussalen, Hus 463, Campus US, Linköping, 13:00 (Swedish)
Opponent
Supervisors
Available from: 2019-10-07 Created: 2019-10-07 Last updated: 2020-01-16Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Håkansson, IreneJohansson, LovisaDahle, CharlotteVrethem, MagnusErnerudh, Jan
By organisation
Division of Neuro and Inflammation ScienceFaculty of Medicine and Health SciencesDepartment of Neurology in LinköpingDivison of NeurobiologyDepartment of Clinical Immunology and Transfusion Medicine
In the same journal
Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders
Immunology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 362 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf