liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Comparing Imitation Responding and IBT for children with ASD, a preschool intervention
Univ Gothenburg, Sweden; Child and Adolescent Habilitat and Hlth Unit, Sweden; Queen Silvia Childrens Hosp, Sweden.
Linköping University, Department of Behavioural Sciences and Learning, Psychology. Linköping University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5025-9975
Univ Gothenburg, Sweden.
2019 (English)In: Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, ISSN 1471-3802, E-ISSN 1471-3802Article in journal (Refereed) Epub ahead of print
Abstract [en]

The present study examined the effectiveness of two interventions, Imitation Responding (IR) and Intensive Behavior Treatment (IBT) used as initial treatment programs for autistic children enrolled in ordinary preschools. The interventions were carried out by parents and/or preschool teachers with supervision from Child Adolescent Habilitation and Health Clinics. Children were randomly assigned to either the IR group or the IBT group. The IR group received a new focused imitation treatment averaging 2.2 hours per week, while the children in the IBT group received 14.4 hours treatment per week. The outcome was measured with subscales from PEP-3 and Vineland-II, covering language and social domains. The between-group comparison revealed no significant differences in effect of treatment during the 5 months that encompassed the period from pre- to posttest. Within-group comparisons revealed significant changes on four subscales for the IR-group, with the highest effect sizes for play and expressive language, while for the children in the IBT-group a significant gain was evident for five subscales with the highest effect sizes observed for expressive and receptive language. These findings suggest that IR can be used as an initial and complementary method in settings where IBT is usually the primary treatment of choice.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
WILEY , 2019.
Keywords [en]
Autism spectrum disorader; Preschool children; IBT; intervention - imitation
National Category
Pedagogy
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-164441DOI: 10.1111/1471-3802.12468ISI: 000482072900001OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-164441DiVA, id: diva2:1416906
Note

Funding Agencies|Health and Habilitation; Region West Sweden; Queen Silvia Jubilee Fund, Stockholm; Jerringfonden, Stockholm; European Science Foundation Cooperation in Science and Technology Action (ESF COST Action), Enhancing the Scientific Study of Early Autism (ESSEA) [BM 1004]

Available from: 2020-03-25 Created: 2020-03-25 Last updated: 2020-03-25

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Heimann, Mikael
By organisation
PsychologyFaculty of Arts and Sciences
In the same journal
Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs
Pedagogy

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf