liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Planned maintenance
A system upgrade is planned for 10/12-2024, at 12:00-13:00. During this time DiVA will be unavailable.
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Oral health-related quality of life among children with excessive overjet or unilateral posterior crossbite with functional shift compared to children with no or mild orthodontic treatment need
Region Östergötland, Public Dental Health Care, Center for Orthodontics/Pedodontics Norrköping.
Department of Orthodontics, County Council Halland, Halmstad, Sweden.
Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Odontology, Malmö University, Sweden.
Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Odontology, Malmö University, Sweden.
Show others and affiliations
2019 (English)In: European Journal of Orthodontics, ISSN 0141-5387, E-ISSN 1460-2210, Vol. 41, no 2, p. 111-116Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Objectives

To compare Oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) among 9-year-old children with excessive overjet (EO) to children with unilateral posterior crossbite (UPC) and children with normal occlusion (NO).

Materials and methods

The study sample sourced from 19 Public Dental Service Clinics in Sweden. Reported are baseline data originating from two controlled trials, one regarding UPC and the other focusing on EO. The NO children derive from the same trials. The UPC group comprised 93 children (45 boys and 48 girls), the EO group 71 children (36 boys and 35 girls), and the NO group 65 children (32 boys and 33 girls). In conjunction to a clinical examination, all children completed the Child Perceptions Questionnaire (CPQ8-10) for evaluation of OHRQoL. The CPQ8-10 comprises 25 questions grouped into four domains: oral symptoms, functional limitations, emotional, and social well-being. Validated questions about pain in the jaws and face were also included.

Results

The total mean CPQ score was 5.1 for the UPC, 7.4 for the EO, and 4.4 for the NO group, showing a significant difference between the UPC and EO (P = 0.048) and between EO and NO group (P = 0.012). These differences remained when adjusted for the confounders’ caries, trauma, enamel defects, and headache. No difference between UPC and NO was found. The EO children also reported significantly higher scores in the domains emotional and social well-being (P = 0.039 and P = 0.012).

Limitations

The study would be strengthened if a longitudinal design had been performed.

Conclusion

Children with EO reported significantly lower OHRQoL compared to children with UPC or NO. The children generally reported low CPQ scores that imply an overall fairly good OHRQoL.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Oxford University Press, 2019. Vol. 41, no 2, p. 111-116
Keywords [en]
child, health-related quality of life, posterior crossbite, overjet, dental
National Category
Dentistry
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-164762DOI: 10.1093/ejo/cjy033ISI: 000464935900001PubMedID: 29878165Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85064113064OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-164762DiVA, id: diva2:1421306
Available from: 2020-04-02 Created: 2020-04-02 Last updated: 2020-04-16Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Kallunki, Jenny

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Kallunki, Jenny
By organisation
Center for Orthodontics/Pedodontics Norrköping
In the same journal
European Journal of Orthodontics
Dentistry

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 33 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf