liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Femoral nerve blocks for the treatment of acute pre-hospital pain: A systematic review with meta-analysis
Oulu Univ Hosp, Finland; Univ Oulu, Finland.
Landspitalinn Univ Hosp, Iceland.
Univ Stavanger, Norway; Norwegian Air Ambulance Fdn, Norway; Sorlandet Hosp, Norway.
Prehosp Emergency Med Serv, Denmark; Reg Hosp Horsens, Denmark.
Show others and affiliations
2020 (English)In: Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, ISSN 0001-5172, E-ISSN 1399-6576, Vol. 64, no 8, p. 1038-1047Article, review/survey (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background Pain management is one of the most important interventions in the emergency medical services. The femoral nerve block (FNB) is, among other things, indicated for pre- and post-operative pain management for patients with femoral fractures but its role in the pre-hospital setting has not been determined. The aim of this review was to assess the effect and safety of the FNB in comparison to other forms of analgesia (or no treatment) for managing acute lower extremity pain in adult patients in the pre-hospital setting. Methods A systematic review (PROSPERO registration (CRD42018114399)) was conducted. The Cochrane and GRADE methods were used to assess outcomes. Two authors independently reviewed each study for eligibility, extracted the data and performed risk of bias assessments. Results Four studies with a total of 252 patients were included. Two RCTs (114 patients) showed that FNB may reduce pain more effectively than metamizole (mean difference 32 mm on a 100 mm VAS (95% CI 24 to 40)). One RCT (48 patients) compared the FNB with lidocaine and magnesium sulphate to FNB with lidocaine alone and was only included here for information regarding adverse effects. One case series included 90 patients. Few adverse events were reported in the included studies. The certainty of evidence was very low. We found no studies comparing FNB to inhaled analgesics, opioids or ketamine. Conclusions Evidence regarding the effectiveness and adverse effects of pre-hospital FNB is limited. Studies comparing pre-hospital FNB to inhaled analgesics, opioids or ketamine are lacking.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
WILEY , 2020. Vol. 64, no 8, p. 1038-1047
National Category
Anesthesiology and Intensive Care
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-165677DOI: 10.1111/aas.13600ISI: 000528023600001PubMedID: 32270488OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-165677DiVA, id: diva2:1432004
Note

Funding Agencies|Oulu University Hospital

Available from: 2020-05-25 Created: 2020-05-25 Last updated: 2021-04-19

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Larsen, Robert
By organisation
Division of Surgery, Orthopedics and OncologyFaculty of Medicine and Health SciencesANOPIVA US
In the same journal
Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica
Anesthesiology and Intensive Care

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 21 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf