liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
System disruptions
We are currently experiencing disruptions on the search portals due to high traffic. We are working to resolve the issue, you may temporarily encounter an error message.
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Ideal and actual roles of university professors in academic integrity management: a comparative study
Cranfield Univ, England.
Linköping University, Department of Management and Engineering, Project Innovations and Entrepreneurship. Linköping University, Faculty of Science & Engineering.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3863-1073
2022 (English)In: Studies in Higher Education, ISSN 0307-5079, E-ISSN 1470-174X, Vol. 47, no 3, p. 526-544Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Unethical behaviour has become an increasingly controversial issue in Higher Education institutes. There have been debates about the reasons for the increase in unethical behaviour. But many of those debates contain problems. A key problem has been the lack of empirical results about faculty members perceptions of their role in the phenomenon, how cultural contexts influence the perception of university teachers about their role in the academic integrity field and whether conflicts exist between what they believe their role should be and the types of roles they actually play. The aim of the study is to explore this aspect using a qualitative research design to facilitate comprehensive access to faculty members beliefs and practices. The findings suggest that professors believe the teaching role extends beyond encouraging the learning of the subject matter being studied and includes offering education and information to students about the importance of avoiding academic misconduct such as cheating and plagiarism. Implications for university across different countries are also discussed.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD , 2022. Vol. 47, no 3, p. 526-544
Keywords [en]
Ideal role; actual role; academic integrity; plagiarism; HE; cultural context
National Category
Pedagogy
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-167414DOI: 10.1080/03075079.2020.1767051ISI: 000539146200001OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-167414DiVA, id: diva2:1452014
Note

Funding Agencies|Forte: Swedish Research Council for Health, Working Life and Welfare [2018-00321]

Available from: 2020-07-03 Created: 2020-07-03 Last updated: 2023-03-07Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full text

Authority records

Karabag, Solmaz Filiz

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Karabag, Solmaz Filiz
By organisation
Project Innovations and EntrepreneurshipFaculty of Science & Engineering
In the same journal
Studies in Higher Education
Pedagogy

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 208 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf