liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Alliance-outcome relation and progress feedback: Secondary data analyses of a randomized clinical trial study in China
Cent China Normal Univ, Peoples R China.
Cent China Normal Univ, Peoples R China.
Univ North Texas, TX 76203 USA.
Cent China Normal Univ, Peoples R China.
Show others and affiliations
2021 (English)In: Psychotherapy Research, ISSN 1050-3307, E-ISSN 1468-4381, Vol. 31, no 2, p. 145-156Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Objective: This study examined the alliance-outcome relation and the possible moderation effect of receiving progress feedback on a sample of Chinese clients.Method: One hundred and fifty-nine clients recruited from a university counseling center in central China filled out the Session Rating Scale (SRS) and the Outcome Rating Scale (ORS) each session. Participants were randomly assigned to either the progress feedback group or non-feedback group. Therapists working with clients in the feedback group received their clients SRS and ORS scores weekly and were asked to plot their scores in a chart. The alliance-outcome and moderator effects were tested with disaggregated cross-lagged panel modeling of SRS and ORS.Results: The findings indicated a strong reciprocal relation between SRS and ORS, but the moderator effect due to feedback was not supported.Conclusion: Results affirm the cross-cultural stability of the session-by-session reciprocal effects of the alliance-outcome model in a Chinese sample. The issue of whether feedback moderates the within-person alliance-outcome relationship needs to be studied further.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD , 2021. Vol. 31, no 2, p. 145-156
Keywords [en]
working alliance; treatment outcome; feedback; cross-lagged panel model
National Category
Applied Psychology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-167753DOI: 10.1080/10503307.2020.1772517ISI: 000545161200001PubMedID: 32490758OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-167753DiVA, id: diva2:1454920
Note

Funding Agencies|National Residents Knowledge of Mental Health and Promotion Strategies [16ZDA232]; Open Research Program from Key Laboratory of Human Development and Mental Health of Hubei Province, Peoples Republic of China; Chinese National Funding of Social Sciences [16ZDA232]

Available from: 2020-07-21 Created: 2020-07-21 Last updated: 2022-10-03

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Falkenström, Fredrik
By organisation
PsychologyFaculty of Arts and Sciences
In the same journal
Psychotherapy Research
Applied Psychology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 32 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf