liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Psychometric evaluation of hearing specific self-report measures and their associations with psychosocial and demographic variables
Linköping University, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Technical Audiology . Linköping University, Faculty of Health Sciences. Östergötlands Läns Landsting, Reconstruction Centre, Department of ENT - Head and Neck Surgery UHL.
Linköping University, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Technical Audiology . Linköping University, Faculty of Health Sciences.
Linköping University, Department of Behavioural Sciences and Learning, Clinical and Social Psychology. Linköping University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4753-6745
2007 (English)In: Audiological Medicine, ISSN 1651-386X, Vol. 5, no 3, 188-199 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

The main aim of this study was to collect descriptive data and to evaluate the psychometric properties of a range of self-report questionnaires in a Swedish population. Other aims were to investigate the correlations between these measures and the higher order factorial structure of the included questionnaires. One hundred and sixty-two first-time hearing aid users completed four standardized hearing specific questionnaires: the Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly (HHIE); the Satisfaction with Amplification in Daily Life (SADL); the Communication Strategies Scale (CSS); and the International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids (IOI-HA). In addition, two psychosocial questionnaires were completed: the Sense of Coherence scale (SOC); and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). All measures were administered at one year post hearing aid fitting. Mean scores for the questionnaires were in agreement with previous studies. The questionnaires were found to be reliable and acceptable for further clinical use. Correlations were seen across different hearing specific questionnaires, and between hearing aid use and satisfaction. Psychosocial variables were more strongly associated with participation restriction and satisfaction than with the demographic variables, confirming the importance of subjective measures. The factor analysis extracted four factors: psychosocial well-being, hearing aid satisfaction, adaptive communications strategies, and residual participation restriction, and indicated that the number of questionnaires could be reduced. It is concluded that psychosocial factors are important to consider in hearing aid rehabilitation and their possible role should be further investigated in future studies.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2007. Vol. 5, no 3, 188-199 p.
Keyword [en]
Hearing aids, satisfaction, participation restriction, sense of coherence
National Category
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-12456DOI: 10.1080/16513860701560214OAI: diva2:146
Available from: 2008-09-05 Created: 2008-09-05 Last updated: 2014-11-28
In thesis
1. Approaches to Audiological Rehabilitation with Hearing Aids: studies on pre-fitting strategies and assessment of outcomes
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Approaches to Audiological Rehabilitation with Hearing Aids: studies on pre-fitting strategies and assessment of outcomes
2008 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

Fourteen percent of the Swedish population report subjective hearing loss. The number of persons suffering from hearing loss is expected to increase in accordance with the increased length of the average life span, causing an associated increase in the demand for hearing health care services as new patient groups who expect a higher quality of life begin to request hearing care. The main goal of this thesis was to develop new approaches in audiological rehabilitation to meet these demands and achieve user satisfaction.

Two randomized controlled trials including 39 and 38 subjects, respectively were performed that evaluated two interventions, user-controlled adjustment and sound awareness training, which were performed prior to a hearing aid fitting. The new approaches focused on increasing user participation and activity. To evaluate the goals of audiological rehabilitation, e.g., reducing auditory impairment, optimizing auditory activities and minimizing participation restrictions, several standardized self-reporting instruments were used to assess activity limitations, participation restriction, satisfaction and psychosocial well-being. Several of the instruments were validated for a Swedish population in a postal survey including 162 subjects. Furthermore, an interview instrument that was appropriate for telephone interviews and a categorization rating scale were developed for assessing the global clinical impression of the audiological rehabilitation.

Few significant differences in outcomes were found between the treatment and control groups in the short term, and the interventions did not achieve additional or more successful hearing aid users in the long term. Thus, it was concluded that the hearing aid rehabilitation was effective in and of itself, as both the treatment and control groups showed significant improvements in psychosocial well-being and reduced activity limitation and participation restriction. The self-report instruments were found to be valid, and a factor analysis indicated that the number of questionnaires could be reduced with a recommendation for further clinical use. The telephone interviews evaluating the clinical global impression of the audiological rehabilitation were found to be effective and showed success in a vast majority of the users. Advantages such as simpler administration and less time consumption warrant their continued use in additional audiological settings.

The pre-interventions in these studies need to be further investigated before they could be recommended for clinical use also in a Swedish context. The international standardized self reports, however, can already be recommended for clinical use. A first attempt to evaluate global clinical impression by telephone interviews was found to be effective and further validations are suggested.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Linköping: Linköping University Electronic Press, 2008. 86 p.
Linköping University Medical Dissertations, ISSN 0345-0082 ; 1074Studies from the Swedish Institute for Disability Research, ISSN 1650-1128 ; 27
National Category
urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-12528 (URN)978-91-7393-828-0 (ISBN)
Public defence
2008-09-19, Elsa Brändströmsalen, Universitetssjukhuset, Campus US, Linköpings Universitet, Linköping, 13:00 (English)
Available from: 2008-09-11 Created: 2008-09-11 Last updated: 2014-11-28Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full textLink to Ph.D. Thesis

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Öberg, MarieLunner, ThomasAndersson, Gerhard
By organisation
Technical Audiology Faculty of Health SciencesDepartment of ENT - Head and Neck Surgery UHLClinical and Social PsychologyFaculty of Arts and Sciences
In the same journal
Audiological Medicine

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 970 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link