liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
System disruptions
We are currently experiencing disruptions on the search portals due to high traffic. We are working to resolve the issue, you may temporarily encounter an error message.
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Stakeholders’ views on and experiences with the articulation of social dialogue and its effectiveness
CEPS, Bruxelles, Belgien.
Central European Labour Studies Institute, Bratislava, Slovakien.
Central European Labour Studies Institute, Bratislava, Slovakien.
Linköping University, Department of Management and Engineering, The Institute for Analytical Sociology, IAS.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5057-1985
2019 (English)Report (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

Bringing together five consortium partners, the EESDA project, implemented during 2017-2019, advances the current knowledge and expertise on the articulation of social dialogue in Europe and its effectiveness. It studies the ways in which social dialogue at different levels functions and the channels through which EU-level social dialogue - across and within sectors – affects the actors, decisions and outcomes at national and sub-national level, and vice versa. Research conducted within the EESDA project includes an assessment of social dialogue articulation between national and European level across 27 EU member states by means of desk research, an online survey among national social partners and interviews with EU-level social partners as well as other national stakeholders. It then concentrates on the effectiveness of social dialogue in six EU Member States (i.e. Estonia, Ireland, France, Portugal, Slovakia and Sweden – with distinct industrial relations models and traditions) and four sectors (i.e. construction, commerce, education and healthcare, with a focus on a specific occupation in each sector). Findings from interviews, case studies and discourse analysis are completed using network analysis that sets out to visualise and reveal strong and weak ties between different actors and to draw lessons for experiences and best practices in other sectors and countries. The analysis considers efforts that have a direct and indirect impact on social dialogue, such as EU Directives, Autonomous Agreements, Framework of Actions, joint projects, joint statements or programme funding.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Brussels, 2019. , p. 76
Series
CEPS papers ; 25211
National Category
Political Science
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-168835OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-168835DiVA, id: diva2:1463488
Available from: 2020-09-02 Created: 2020-09-02 Last updated: 2020-09-18Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

https://ideas.repec.org/p/eps/cepswp/25211.html

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Nordlund, Carl
By organisation
The Institute for Analytical Sociology, IAS
Political Science

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 180 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf