liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Work capacity assessments and efforts to achieve a job match for claimants in a social security setting: an international inventory
Univ Groningen, Netherlands; Inst Employee Benefits Schemes UWV, Netherlands; AMC UMCG UWV VUmc, Netherlands.
Univ Groningen, Netherlands; AMC UMCG UWV VUmc, Netherlands.
Linköping University, Department of Behavioural Sciences and Learning, Education and Sociology. Linköping University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-3310-0895
Univ Groningen, Netherlands; AMC UMCG UWV VUmc, Netherlands.
2022 (English)In: Disability and Rehabilitation, ISSN 0963-8288, E-ISSN 1464-5165, Vol. 44, no 10, p. 1898-1907Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Purpose Many high-income countries are witnessing a shift of focus on eligibility for disability benefits towards promotion of work reintegration. However, little is known about how countries assess work capacity, and how a job match is then obtained. The current study aims to compare work capacity assessments and available efforts to achieve a job match in eight high-income OECD countries. Methods A survey was conducted among key stakeholders concerning organization of work capacity assessments in social security settings, and efforts made to obtain a job, across eight OECD countries: Australia, Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Sweden, the Netherlands, the United Kingdom and the United States. Results In most countries, work capacity is assessed at several time points, with variations in moments and in information used for job matching. In countries obtaining information on personal and work levels, the search to find a job match usually begins with the persons who have disabilities. Conclusion Although a shift towards a holistic focus in work capacity assessment has been recognized, medical factors still prevail. Limited emphasis is placed on the implications of functional limitations for the possibilities of work. A holistic approach to assessment needs to be coupled with holistic support measures through provision of coordinated and high quality job matching services.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD , 2022. Vol. 44, no 10, p. 1898-1907
Keywords [en]
Disability; reintegration; multidimensional; environmental factors; biopsychosocial; work participation
National Category
Health Care Service and Management, Health Policy and Services and Health Economy
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-169322DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2020.1810787ISI: 000563346800001PubMedID: 32854558OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-169322DiVA, id: diva2:1466678
Available from: 2020-09-12 Created: 2020-09-12 Last updated: 2022-10-26

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Ståhl, Christian
By organisation
Education and SociologyFaculty of Arts and Sciences
In the same journal
Disability and Rehabilitation
Health Care Service and Management, Health Policy and Services and Health Economy

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 344 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf