liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Book Review: The Habermas-Rawls Debate in ETHICAL PERSPECTIVES, vol 26, issue 4, pp 704-707
Linköping University, Department of Culture and Society, Division of Philosophy, History, Arts and Religion. Linköping University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences.
2020 (English)In: Ethical Perspectives, ISSN 1370-0049, E-ISSN 1783-1431, Vol. 26, no 4, p. 704-707Article, book review (Other academic) Published
Abstract [en]

n/a

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
PEETERS , 2020. Vol. 26, no 4, p. 704-707
National Category
Ethics
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-171802ISI: 000585681000016OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-171802DiVA, id: diva2:1507471
Available from: 2020-12-07 Created: 2020-12-07 Last updated: 2020-12-16Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Authority records

Collste, Göran

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Collste, Göran
By organisation
Division of Philosophy, History, Arts and ReligionFaculty of Arts and Sciences
In the same journal
Ethical Perspectives
Ethics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 171 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf