liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Cardiovascular risk factors and body composition in adults with achondroplasia
Sunnaas Rehabil Hosp, Norway; Univ Oslo, Norway.
Linköping University, Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Division of Society and Health. Linköping University, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences. AMRA Med AB, Linkoping, Sweden.
Linköping University, Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Division of Diagnostics and Specialist Medicine. Linköping University, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences. Linköping University, Center for Medical Image Science and Visualization (CMIV). AMRA Med AB, Linkoping, Sweden.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6189-0807
Oslo Univ Hosp, Norway.
Show others and affiliations
2021 (English)In: Genetics in Medicine, ISSN 1098-3600, E-ISSN 1530-0366, Vol. 23, p. 732-739Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Purpose An increased cardiovascular mortality has been reported in achondroplasia. This population-based, case-control study investigated cardiovascular risk factors and body composition in Norwegian adults with achondroplasia. Methods We conducted anthropometric, clinical, and laboratory assessments in 49 participants with achondroplasia, of whom 40 completed magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for body composition analysis. Controls consisted of 98 UK Biobank participants, matched for body mass index (BMI), sex, and age. Results Participants were well matched for BMI (33.3 versus 32.5 kg/m(2)) and sex, but achondroplasia participants were younger than controls (mean age 41.1 versus 54.3 years). Individuals with achondroplasia had lower age-adjusted mean blood pressure, total and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, and triglycerides compared with controls, but similar fasting glucose and HbA1c values. Age-adjusted mean visceral fat store was 1.9 versus 5.3 L (difference -2.7, 95% confidence interval [CI] -3.6 to -1.9; P < 0.001), abdominal subcutaneous fat was 6.0 versus 11.2 L (-4.7, 95% CI -5.9 to -3.4; P < 0.001), and liver fat was 2.2 versus 6.9% (-2.8, 95% CI -5.2 to -0.4; P = 0.02). Conclusion Despite a high BMI, the cardiovascular risks appeared similar or lower in achondroplasia compared with controls, indicating that other factors might contribute to the increased mortality observed in this condition.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
SPRINGERNATURE , 2021. Vol. 23, p. 732-739
National Category
Medical Genetics
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-171838DOI: 10.1038/s41436-020-01024-6ISI: 000590277100001PubMedID: 33204020OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-171838DiVA, id: diva2:1507970
Note

Funding Agencies|Norwegian Restricted Growth Association (NiK); Dam Foundation [2019/FO249324]; Norwegian National Advisory Unit on Rare Disorders (NKSD) [226038, 226053]

Available from: 2020-12-09 Created: 2020-12-09 Last updated: 2023-09-29

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Authority records

Dahlqvist Leinhard, Olof

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Linge, JenniferDahlqvist Leinhard, Olof
By organisation
Division of Society and HealthFaculty of Medicine and Health SciencesDivision of Diagnostics and Specialist MedicineCenter for Medical Image Science and Visualization (CMIV)
In the same journal
Genetics in Medicine
Medical Genetics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 50 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf