liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Using the World Apheresis Association Registry Helps to Improve the Treatment Quality of Therapeutic Apheresis
Umea Univ, Sweden.
Bone Marrow Transplant & Apheresis, Australia.
Dept Pediat, Austria.
AKH, Austria.
Show others and affiliations
2021 (English)In: Transfusion Medicine and Hemotherapy, ISSN 1660-3796, E-ISSN 1660-3818, Vol. 48, no 4, p. 234-239Article, review/survey (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Therapeutic apheresis (TA) is prescribed to patients that suffer from a severe progressive disease that is not sufficiently treated by conventional medications. A way to gain more knowledge about this treatment is usually by the local analysis of data. However, the use of large quality assessment registries enables analyses of even rare findings. Here, we report some of the recent data from the World Apheresis Association (WAA) registry. Data from >104,000 procedures were documented, and TA was performed on >15,000 patients. The main indication for TA was the collection of autologous stem cells (45% of patients) as part of therapy for therapy. Collection of stem cells from donors for allogeneic transplantation was performed in 11% of patients. Patients with indications such as neurological diseases underwent plasma exchange (28%). Extracorporeal photochemotherapy, lipid apheresis, and antibody removal were other indications. Side effects recorded in the registry have decreased significantly over the years, with approximately only 10/10,000 procedures being interrupted for medical reasons. Conclusion: Collection of data from TA procedures within a multinational and multicenter concept facilitates the improvement of treatment by enabling the analysis of and feedback on indications, procedures, effects, and side effects. (c) 2021 S. Karger AG, Basel

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
KARGER , 2021. Vol. 48, no 4, p. 234-239
Keywords [en]
Registry; Apheresis; Adverse events; Diagnoses
National Category
Hematology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-172986DOI: 10.1159/000513123ISI: 000605708800001OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-172986DiVA, id: diva2:1522810
Note

Funding Agencies|Swedish National Registry; Njurforeningen Vasterbotten

Available from: 2021-01-26 Created: 2021-01-26 Last updated: 2022-03-16

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Berlin, Gösta
By organisation
Division of Inflammation and InfectionFaculty of Medicine and Health SciencesDepartment of Clinical Immunology and Transfusion Medicine
In the same journal
Transfusion Medicine and Hemotherapy
Hematology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 27 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf