liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Endovascular Versus Open: Emergency Department Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta or Thoracotomy for Management of Post-Injury Non-compressible Torso Hemorrhage
Univ Ottawa, Canada.
Univ Texas Hlth Sci Ctr Houston, TX 77030 USA.
Tulane, LA USA.
VCU Surg Trauma Crit Care & Emergency Surg, VA USA.
Show others and affiliations
2020 (English)In: JOURNAL OF ENDOVASCULAR RESUSCITATION AND TRAUMA MANAGEMENT, ISSN 2002-7567, Vol. 4, no 2, p. 109-119Article, review/survey (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Non-compressible torso hemorrhage (NCTH) (i.e. bleeding from anatomical locations not amenable to control by direct pressure or tourniquet application) is a leading cause of potentially preventable death after injury. In select trauma patients with infra-diaphragmatic NCTH-related hemorrhagic shock or traumatic circulatory arrest, occlusion of the aorta proximal to the site of hemorrhage may sustain or restore spontaneous circulation. While the traditional method of achieving proximal aortic occlusion included Emergency Department thoracotomy (EDT) with descending thoracic aortic cross-clamping, resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) affords a less invasive option when thoracotomy is not required for other indications. In this article, we review the innovation, pathophysiologic effects, indications for, and technique of EDT and partial, intermittent, and complete REBOA in injured patients, including recommended methods for reversing aortic occlusion. We also discuss advantages and disadvantages of each of these methods of proximal aortic occlusion and review studies comparing their effectiveness and safety for managing post-injury NCTH. We conclude by providing recommendations as to when each of these methods may be best, when indicated, to manage injured patients with NCTH.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
OREBRO UNIV HOSPITAL , 2020. Vol. 4, no 2, p. 109-119
Keywords [en]
Emergency Department Thoracotomy; Noncompressible Torso Hemorrhage; Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta; Wounds and Injuries
National Category
Anesthesiology and Intensive Care
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-173210DOI: 10.26676/jevtm.v4i2.136ISI: 000608018100007OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-173210DiVA, id: diva2:1527388
Available from: 2021-02-10 Created: 2021-02-10 Last updated: 2021-02-10

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Priouzram, Artai
By organisation
Department of Cardiology in Linköping
Anesthesiology and Intensive Care

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 72 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf