liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Planned maintenance
A system upgrade is planned for 10/12-2024, at 12:00-13:00. During this time DiVA will be unavailable.
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
On how to measure the probabilities of target atom ionization and target ion back-attraction in high-power impulse magnetron sputtering
Leibniz Inst Surface Engn IOM, Germany.
Univ Iceland, Iceland; Univ Twente, Netherlands.
KTH Royal Inst Technol, Sweden.
Univ Iceland, Iceland; KTH Royal Inst Technol, Sweden.
Show others and affiliations
2021 (English)In: Journal of Applied Physics, ISSN 0021-8979, E-ISSN 1089-7550, Vol. 129, no 3, article id 033303Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

High-power impulse magnetron sputtering (HiPIMS) is an ionized physical vapor deposition technique that provides a high flux of ionized target species for thin film growth. Optimization of HiPIMS processes is, however, often difficult, since the influence of external process parameters, such as working gas pressure, magnetic field strength, and pulse configuration, on the deposition process characteristics is not well understood. The reason is that these external parameters are only indirectly connected to the two key flux parameters, the deposition rate and ionized flux fraction, via two internal discharge parameters: the target atom ionization probability alpha (t) and the target ion back-attraction probability beta (t). Until now, it has been difficult to assess alpha (t) and beta (t) without resorting to computational modeling, which has hampered knowledge-based optimization. Here, we present a simple method to deduce alpha (t) and beta (t) based on measured deposition rates of neutrals and ions. The core of the method is a refined analytical model, which is described in detail. This approach is furthermore validated by independent calculations of alpha (t) and beta (t) using the considerably more complex ionization region model, which is a plasma-chemical global discharge model.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
AMER INST PHYSICS , 2021. Vol. 129, no 3, article id 033303
National Category
Other Materials Engineering
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-173400DOI: 10.1063/5.0036902ISI: 000610089000003OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-173400DiVA, id: diva2:1529988
Note

Funding Agencies|Free State of Saxony; European Regional Development FundEuropean Union (EU) [100336119]; Icelandic Research Fund [130029, 196141]; Swedish Research CouncilSwedish Research Council [VR 2018-04139]; Swedish Government Strategic Research Area in Materials Science on Functional Materials at Linkoping University [2009-00971]

Available from: 2021-02-20 Created: 2021-02-20 Last updated: 2021-02-20

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Brenning, NilsLundin, Daniel
By organisation
Plasma and Coating PhysicsFaculty of Science & Engineering
In the same journal
Journal of Applied Physics
Other Materials Engineering

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 21 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf