liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Endotoxin Removal in Septic Shock with the Alteco LPS Adsorber Was Safe But Showed no Benefit Compared to Placebo in the Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial: the Asset Study
Uppsala Univ, Sweden.
Uppsala Univ, Sweden.
Oslo Univ Hosp, Norway; Univ Oslo, Norway.
Univ Tampere, Finland; Tampere Univ Hosp, Finland.
Show others and affiliations
2020 (English)In: Shock, ISSN 1073-2322, E-ISSN 1540-0514, Vol. 54, no 2, p. 224-231Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Purpose: Lipopolysaccharides (LPS) are presumed to contribute to the inflammatory response in sepsis. We investigated if extracorporeal Alteco LPS Adsorber for LPS removal in early gram-negative septic shock was feasible and safe. Also, effects on endotoxin level, inflammatory response, and organ function were assessed. Methods: A pilot, double-blinded, randomized, Phase IIa, feasibility clinical investigation was undertaken in six Scandinavian intensive care units aiming to allocate 32 septic shock patients with abdominal or urogenital focus on LPS Adsorber therapy or a Sham Adsorber, therapy without active LPS binding. The study treatment was initiated within 12 h of inclusion and given for 6 h daily on first 2 days. LPS was measured in all patients. Results: The investigation was terminated after 527 days with eight patients included in the LPS Adsorber group and seven in the Sham group. Twenty-one adverse effects, judged not to be related to the device, were reported in three patients in the LPS Adsorber group and two in the Sham group. Two patients in the Sham group and no patients in the LPS Adsorber group died within 28 days. Plasma LPS levels were low without groups differences during or after adsorber therapy. The changes in inflammatory markers and organ function were similar in the groups. Conclusions: In a small cohort of patients with presumed gram-negative septic shock, levels of circulating endotoxin were low and no adverse effects within 28 days after LPS adsorber-treatment were observed. No benefit compared with a sham device was seen when using a LPS adsorber in addition to standard care.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2020. Vol. 54, no 2, p. 224-231
Keywords [en]
Endotoxins; gram-negative bacteria; hemoperfusion; septic shock
National Category
Surgery
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-173859DOI: 10.1097/SHK.0000000000001503ISI: 000619496600012PubMedID: 31880758Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85088179035OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-173859DiVA, id: diva2:1535963
Note

Funding Agencies|Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala University; ALTECO Medical AB; Swedish Research CouncilSwedish Research CouncilEuropean Commission [523-2014-2569]

Available from: 2021-03-09 Created: 2021-03-09 Last updated: 2021-05-03Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Chew, Michelle S

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
de Geer, LinaChew, Michelle S
By organisation
Division of Clinical Chemistry and PharmacologyFaculty of Medicine and Health SciencesANOPIVA USDivision of Drug Research
In the same journal
Shock
Surgery

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 58 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf