Who do we miss when screening for postpartum depression?: A population-based study in a Swedish regionShow others and affiliations
2021 (English)In: Journal of Affective Disorders, ISSN 0165-0327, E-ISSN 1573-2517, Vol. 287, p. 165-173Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]
Background: Universal screening for postpartum depression is crucial for early detection, interventions and support. The aim of this study was to describe the proportion of, and explore risk factors for, women not being offered screening, as well as for declining an offer or not being screened due to any other unknown reason. Methods: Socioeconomic, obstetrical and neonatal data, extracted from the Swedish Pregnancy Registry, for 9,959 pregnancies recorded for the ?Ostergo?tland county between 2016 and 2018 were linked to Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) screening results at 6?8 weeks postpartum, extracted from medical records. Risk factors were assessed using logistic regression models and with a nomogram for easy visualization. Results: In total, there were no recorded offers of EPDS screening in the medical records for 30.0% of women at the postpartum follow-up. Women born outside of Sweden and women reporting poor self-rated health were at increased risk of not being offered screening for postpartum depression. Limitations: There is a possibility that women were offered screening or were screened, but this was incorrectly or never recorded in medical records. Conclusions: The majority of women were offered screening for postpartum depression, but there is room for improvement in order to achieve universal screening. Awareness among healthcare providers of the risk factors for not screening might increase adherence to guidelines for universal screening. Overcoming barriers for screening and raising the topic of mental-health issues for postpartum women should be prioritized.
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
ELSEVIER , 2021. Vol. 287, p. 165-173
Keywords [en]
Postpartum depression; Edinburgh postnatal depression scale; Screening tools
National Category
Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-175808DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2021.03.013ISI: 000644180100020PubMedID: 33799034OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-175808DiVA, id: diva2:1557220
Note
Funding Agencies|Swedish Research CouncilSwedish Research CouncilEuropean Commission [523-2014-2342, 523-2014-07605, 2020-01965]; Marianne and Marcus Wallenberg foundation [MMW2011.0115]; ALF-grants Region Uppsalakalkidou-ALF2020Region Auvergne-Rhone-AlpesRegion Bourgogne-Franche-ComteRegion Hauts-de-FranceRegion Nouvelle-Aquitaine [Skalkidou-ALF-2020]; Swedish Medical Association [SLS-250581]; ALF-Grants Region Ostergotland [LIO-35 9731]; Swedish Psychiatry foundation; Fredrik and Inger Thurings Foundation [2017-00324]
2021-05-252021-05-252021-05-25