liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Psychometric evaluation of the implantable cardioverter defibrillator body image concerns questionnaire (ICD-BICQ)
Univ Southern Denmark, Denmark; Odense Univ Hosp, Denmark; Odense Univ Hosp, Denmark; Univ Southern Denmark, Denmark.
Odense Univ Hosp, Denmark.
Odense Univ Hosp, Denmark; Univ Southern Denmark, Denmark.
Linköping University, Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Division of Nursing Sciences and Reproductive Health. Linköping University, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences. Region Östergötland, Heart Center, Department of Cardiology in Linköping. Odense Univ Hosp, Denmark.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4259-3671
Show others and affiliations
2021 (English)In: Cardiovascular Electrophysiology, ISSN 1045-3873, E-ISSN 1540-8167, Vol. 32, no 8, p. 2295-2311Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background: Patients receiving an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) generally adapt well to living with their device, but we know little about the prevalence of patients body image concerns (BICs) postimplant. Methods: The objectives were to evaluate the psychometric properties of the ICD-body image concerns questionnaire (BICQ), find a cut-off indicating BICs and determine the prevalence of BICs. Construct validity was determined using the Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin test, Scree-plot and explorative factor analysis. Internal consistency was examined via Cronbachs alpha. Correlations to other validated questionnaires, a weighted and simple scale and a cut-off indicating BICs was evaluated. Results: In total, 331 patients completed the 39-item ICD-BICQ together with: Type D Scale (DS14), Generalized Anxiety Disorder scale (GAD-7), Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), and Florida Patient Acceptance Survey. Five patients were excluded due to reoperations, leaving 326 patients in the analyses. Results revealed a one-factor structure with 32 items and Cronbachs alpha at.948. A cut-off at 36 points displayed the 20% patients with the highest score of BICs. The prevalence was 29.8% in women and 18.4% in men. Conclusion: The psychometric evaluation of the 32-item ICD-BICQ showed acceptable construct validity and internal reliability. We recommend a cut-off score at 36 points to identify patients at risk of having BICs. The prevalence of BICs indicated that both men and women are at risk of having BICs. The ICD-BICQ can be used in clinical practice to help healthcare professionals to identify patients at risk of BICs and as to evaluate BICs when implementing new operation techniques.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
WILEY , 2021. Vol. 32, no 8, p. 2295-2311
Keywords [en]
body image concerns; implantable cardioverter defibrillator; prevalence questionnaire
National Category
Cardiac and Cardiovascular Systems
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-177433DOI: 10.1111/jce.15122ISI: 000661172000001PubMedID: 34091980OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-177433DiVA, id: diva2:1574851
Available from: 2021-06-29 Created: 2021-06-29 Last updated: 2022-03-10

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Strömberg, Anna
By organisation
Division of Nursing Sciences and Reproductive HealthFaculty of Medicine and Health SciencesDepartment of Cardiology in Linköping
In the same journal
Cardiovascular Electrophysiology
Cardiac and Cardiovascular Systems

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 38 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf