liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Special Issue on Age of Information and Data Semantics for Sensing, Communication, and Control Co-Design in IoT
Tsinghua Univ, Peoples R China.
Shanghai Univ, Peoples R China.
Linköping University, Department of Science and Technology, Communications and Transport Systems. Linköping University, Faculty of Science & Engineering.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4416-7702
Linköping University, Department of Science and Technology, Communications and Transport Systems. Linköping University, Faculty of Science & Engineering. Univ Maryland, MD 20742 USA.
Show others and affiliations
2021 (English)In: IEEE Internet of Things Journal, ISSN 2327-4662, Vol. 8, no 19, p. 14431-14434Article in journal, Editorial material (Other academic) Published
Abstract [en]

A typical Internet-of-Things (IoT) system consists of three major layers: 1) sensing; 2) communication; and 3) application (i.e., actuation and control) layers. The co-design of these layers has been studied for over two decades, dating back to the concept of communication, computing, and control, i.e., 3C, convergence in the 1990s. Nowadays, with the emergence of wireless-networked machine-type applications, such as connected autonomous driving and factory automation, this co-design is more urgently desired than ever to meet the stringent quality-of-service requirements thereof. To realize this goal, the 5G wireless network of today has mainly focused on the communication part and strived to reliably achieve low air-interface communication delay, i.e., ultra-reliable and low-latency communications (uRLLC). However, more and more wireless communications in IoT are based on status updates instead of general content delivery. The current uRLLC design is insufficient to characterize the status update quality, and thus is unable to optimize for timely status update with constrained wireless resources. Therefore, the performance of computing and control in IoT networks that rely highly on wireless communications is suboptimal.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Piscataway: IEEE-Inst Electrical Electronics Engineers Inc , 2021. Vol. 8, no 19, p. 14431-14434
National Category
Communication Systems
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-179848DOI: 10.1109/JIOT.2021.3104988ISI: 000697822400006Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85115755261OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-179848DiVA, id: diva2:1600550
Available from: 2021-10-05 Created: 2021-10-05 Last updated: 2021-10-20Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Pappas, NikolaosEphremides, Anthony

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Pappas, NikolaosEphremides, Anthony
By organisation
Communications and Transport SystemsFaculty of Science & Engineering
In the same journal
IEEE Internet of Things Journal
Communication Systems

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 26 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf