liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Scandcleft randomized trials of primary surgery for unilateral cleft lip and palate: impact of maxillary dental agenesis on craniofacial growth and dental arch relationship in 8 year olds
Reg Vastra Gotaland, Sweden.
Cleft Palate Ctr, Denmark; Univ Hosp Aarhus, Denmark; Univ Aarhus, Denmark.
Helsinki Univ Hosp, Finland.
Oslo Univ Hosp, Norway.
Show others and affiliations
2021 (English)In: European Journal of Orthodontics, ISSN 0141-5387, E-ISSN 1460-2210, Vol. 43, no 4, p. 381-386Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background: It is suggested that dental agenesis affects maxillary protrusion and dental arch relationship in children with unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP). In addition, an association between the need for orthognathic surgery and dental agenesis is reported. Aim: The aim was to study the impact of maxillary dental agenesis on craniofacial growth and dental arch relationship in 8-year-old children with UCLP. Subjects and methods: The sample consisted of individuals with UCLP from Scandcleft randomized trials. The participants had available data from diagnosis of maxillary dental agenesis as well as cephalometric measurements (n = 399) and GOSLON assessment (n = 408) at 8 years of age. Results: A statistically significant difference was found for ANB between individuals with agenesis of two or more maxillary teeth (mean 1.52 degrees) in comparison with those with no or only one missing maxillary tooth (mean 3.30 degrees and 2.70 degrees, respectively). Mean NSL/NL was lower among individuals with agenesis of two or more maxillary teeth (mean 9.90 degrees), in comparison with individuals with no or one missing maxillary tooth (mean 11.46 degrees and 11.45 degrees, respectively). The number of individuals with GOSLON score 4-5 was 47.2% in the group with two or more missing maxillary teeth and 26.1% respectively 26.3% in the groups with no or one missing maxillary tooth. No statistically significant difference was found in the comparison between individuals with no agenesis or with agenesis solely of the cleft-side lateral. Conclusion: Maxillary dental agenesis impacts on craniofacial growth as well as dental arch relationship and should be considered in orthodontic treatment planning.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
OXFORD UNIV PRESS , 2021. Vol. 43, no 4, p. 381-386
National Category
Dentistry
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-180773DOI: 10.1093/ejo/cjab007ISI: 000707782200003PubMedID: 33693582OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-180773DiVA, id: diva2:1607740
Available from: 2021-11-02 Created: 2021-11-02 Last updated: 2021-11-02

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Marcusson, Agneta
By organisation
Division of Surgery, Orthopedics and OncologyFaculty of Medicine and Health SciencesMaxillofacial Unit
In the same journal
European Journal of Orthodontics
Dentistry

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 11 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf