liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Cyclosporine does not reduce myocardial infarct size in a porcine ischemia-reperfusion model.
Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Sweden; University of Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4852-3065
University of Gothenburg, Sweden.
University of Gothenburg, Sweden.
Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Sweden; University of Gothenburg, Sweden.
Show others and affiliations
2010 (English)In: Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology and Therapeutics, ISSN 1074-2484, E-ISSN 1940-4034, Vol. 15, no 2, p. 182-9Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Cyclosporine A (CsA) has been shown to protect against myocardial ischemia and reperfusion (I/R) injury in small animal models. The aim of the current study was to evaluate the effects of CsA on myocardial I/R injury in a porcine model. Pigs were randomized between CsA (10mg/kg; n = 12) or placebo (n = 15) and anesthetized with either isoflurane (phase I) or pentobarbital (phase II). By catheterization, the left descending coronary artery was occluded for 45 minutes, followed by reperfusion for 2 hours. Hearts were stained to quantify area at risk (AAR) and infarct size (IS). Myocardial biopsies were obtained for terminal dUTP nick end labeling and immunoblot analysis of proapoptotic proteins (apoptosis-inducing factor [AIF], BCL2/adenovirus E1B 19-kd interacting protein 3 [BNIP-3], and active caspase-3). Cyclosporine A did not reduce IS/AAR compared with placebo (49% vs 41%, respectively; P = .21). Pigs anesthetized with isoflurane had lower IS/AAR than pigs anesthetized with pentobarbital (39% vs 51%, respectively; P = .03). This reduction in IS/AAR seemed to be attenuated by CsA. Apoptosis-inducing factor protein expression was higher after CsA administration than after placebo (P = .02). Thus, CsA did not protect against I/R injury in this porcine model. The data suggest a possible deleterious interaction of CsA and isoflurane.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Sage Publications, 2010. Vol. 15, no 2, p. 182-9
Keywords [en]
reperfusion injury, myocardial infarction, cyclosporine A, isoflurane, apoptosis
National Category
Cardiac and Cardiovascular Systems
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-181598DOI: 10.1177/1074248410362074PubMedID: 20435992OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-181598DiVA, id: diva2:1616640
Note

Funding agencies: The study wasfinanced by grants from the Swedish state under the agreementbetween the Swedish government and the county councilsconcerning economic support research and education of doctors(ALF-agreement) and the Swedish Heart Lung Foundation.

Available from: 2021-12-03 Created: 2021-12-03 Last updated: 2021-12-28

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Authority records

Karlsson, Lars O.

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Karlsson, Lars O.
In the same journal
Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology and Therapeutics
Cardiac and Cardiovascular Systems

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 13 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf