liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Impact of COVID-19 on the incidence of CT-diagnosed appendicitis and its complications in the UK and Sweden
European Telemed Clin SL, Australia.
Uppsala Univ, Sweden; Uppsala Univ, Sweden.
Uppsala Univ, Sweden; Uppsala Univ, Sweden.
Uppsala Univ, Sweden; Uppsala Univ, Sweden.
Show others and affiliations
2022 (English)In: International Journal of Colorectal Disease, ISSN 0179-1958, E-ISSN 1432-1262, Vol. 37, p. 1375-1383Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Aim To compare the number of appendicitis cases and its complications, during the first months of the COVID-19 pandemic in Sweden and the UK and the corresponding time period in 2019. Method Reports of emergency abdominopelvic CT performed at 56 Swedish hospitals and 38 British hospitals between April and July 2020 and a corresponding control cohort from 2019 were reviewed. Two radiologists and two surgeons blinded to the date of cohorts analyzed all reports for diagnosis of appendicitis, perforation, and abscess. A random selection of cases was chosen for the measurement of inter-rater agreement. Result Both in Sweden (6111) and the UK (5591) fewer, abdominopelvic CT scans were done in 2020 compared to 2019 (6433 and 7223, respectively); p < 0.001. In the UK, the number of appendicitis was 36% lower in April-June 2020 compared to 2019 but not in Sweden. Among the appendicitis cases, there was a higher number of perforations and abscesses in 2020, in Sweden. In the UK, the number of perforations and abscesses were initially lower (April-June 2020) but increased in July 2020. There was a substantial inter-rater agreement for the diagnosis of perforations and abscess formations (K = 0.64 and 0.77). Conclusion In Sweden, the number of appendicitis was not different between 2019 and 2020; however, there was an increase of complications. In the UK, there was a significant decrease of cases in 2020. The prevalence of complications was lower initially but increased in July. These findings suggest variability in delay in diagnosis of appendicitis depending on the country and time frame studied.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
SPRINGER , 2022. Vol. 37, p. 1375-1383
Keywords [en]
Appendicitis; CT; COVID-19; Abscess; Perforation; Complications; Delay in diagnosis
National Category
Gastroenterology and Hepatology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-185385DOI: 10.1007/s00384-022-04181-zISI: 000796315100001PubMedID: 35575916OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-185385DiVA, id: diva2:1662732
Available from: 2022-06-01 Created: 2022-06-01 Last updated: 2023-03-02Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Authority records

Andersson, Roland

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Andersson, Roland
By organisation
Division of Surgery, Orthopedics and OncologyFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences
In the same journal
International Journal of Colorectal Disease
Gastroenterology and Hepatology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 31 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf