liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Boosting manure biogas production with the application of pretreatments: A meta-analysis
Univ Fed Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Univ Fed Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Univ Fed Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Univ Fed Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Show others and affiliations
2022 (English)In: Journal of Cleaner Production, ISSN 0959-6526, E-ISSN 1879-1786, Vol. 362, article id 132292Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Anaerobic digestion (AD) is a versatile manure management approach that can combine waste treatment, energy generation and nutrient recovery, thus playing a central role in circular economy. The AD process is highly influenced by manure composition which, depending on the source, may contain high loads recalcitrant materials (e.g., lignocellulosic and fibers) or lead to the formation of toxic compounds (e.g., NH3), decreasing the energetic potential of the waste and requiring specific pretreatments to increase its degradability and biogas production. Although there are distinctions in the chemical composition of manure according to animal diets, different manure sources are usually grouped together, leading to a suboptimal performance of both the pretreatment and the AD process. Here, we performed a meta-analysis of 54 studies to evaluate the effects of different pretreatments on different manure types and their effect on methane (CH4) yield and we estimated the energy potential if the appropriate pretreatment is applied to largest manure producing countries. The results showed that chemical and/or biological pretreatments were more effective for omnivore manure (e.g., swine, chicken), while physical and a combination of chemical and physical pretreatments negatively affected CH4 production. Physical and/or chemical pretreatments had a positive effect on CH4 yield from herbivore manure (e. g., cattle, horses), while biological pretreatments had a negative effect. The application of the adequate pretreatment can more than double the energy recovered from manure, allowing for an important substitution of fossil fuels, while decreasing operational costs and environmental risks and ultimately improving profitability. The development of pretreatment technologies and their application are strongly related to public policies for sustainable manure management and biogas use and production.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier, 2022. Vol. 362, article id 132292
Keywords [en]
Anaerobic digestion; Pretreatment; Manure; Biogas; Methane; Meta-analysis
National Category
Energy Systems
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-186479DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132292ISI: 000807790200002Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85130512444OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-186479DiVA, id: diva2:1677092
Note

Funding Agencies: Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior - Brasil (CAPES) [2019-05382]; Brazilian National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq); Vinnova [001]; Swedish Energy Agency [35624-2]; Formas [2021-02429]; FAPERJ; CNPq

Available from: 2022-06-27 Created: 2022-06-27 Last updated: 2022-07-07Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Enrich-Prast, Alex
By organisation
Tema Environmental ChangeFaculty of Arts and SciencesBiogas Research Center
In the same journal
Journal of Cleaner Production
Energy Systems

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 186 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf