liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Patient and relative perspective regarding quality in hospital care for older people: Theory and Methods
Linköping University, Department of Department of Health and Society, Division of Physiotherapy. Linköping University, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-3678-2932
2003 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

Although the elderly population consumes a relatively large proportion of health care, international research has focused little attention on older people and their perception of health care and its outcome. Information is also scanty concerning relatives in hospital care and their actions and the circumstances related to relatives' participation in the care process.

The overall aim of this thesis is to contribute to a better knowledge and understanding of the perspectives of older patients and relatives regarding hospital care and how this knowledge can be used in measurements of quality of hospital care from the patient perspective.

This thesis uses both qualitative and quantitative methods. Study I and II are based on semistructured interviews. In study I a midrange theory and a theoretical model of patients' evaluation process regarding the care was derived. In study II relatives' actions and the circumstances related to their participation in the care process were described. In study III the knowledge obtained in study I was used as a base for development of an instrument 'Patients perspectives on care and rehabilitation process' (POCR) containing structured questions for measuring patients' perceptions regarding the care process. The instrument was used in telephone-interviews for the data collection in study III and IV. In study IV analyses were conducted regarding the interrelation between some of the concepts in the model of patients' evaluation process.

The patient and relative perspectives on hospital care, are based on complex processes that involve their past experiences, present situation and expectations of the of future regarding care and illness/health. The encounters patients and relatives have with staff and the organisation lay the foundations for their future expectations and experiences regarding a potential forthcoming care process. Relatives carry out a variety of actions and engagements based on their own knowledge and ability. Patients and relatives have disparate realities and needs. The three-part interaction between patient, relative and staff is an important factor in patients' and relatives' actions and participation in the care process and in how their needs are met.

Patient perceived needs differ during the different phases of the care process. Patients' perception of needs and care are associated with patients' previous experiences with illness and care, their perception of themselves and the situation, and their expectations regarding health and care.

Patient-perceived results of the care process include how needs were met as well as health outcome. Patients' evaluation of the hospital care is shown to be associated with their previous experiences of the care unit, perceived health outcome including their overall lifesituation post-discharge, as well as patients' expectations regarding their future health postdischarge. These aspects ought to be focused in measures regarding quality of care from patients' perspective.

The POCR instrument was found to have adequate validity and reliability. The instrument reflects patients' different needs during the care process and measure patients' perceptions regarding fulfilment of needs and their importance. Using the telephone interview technique makes it possible for data collectors to learn more about the patient perspective and it resulted in high response rate.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Linköping: Linköping University , 2003. , p. 54
Series
Linköping University Medical Dissertations, ISSN 0345-0082 ; 773
Keywords [en]
patient perspective, older patients, relatives, quality of care, hospital care, POCR, process perspective, continuous quality improvement
National Category
Nursing
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-186673Libris ID: 8857106ISBN: 9173735337 (print)OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-186673DiVA, id: diva2:1678880
Public defence
2003-02-07, Aulan, Hälsans Hus, Hälsouniversitetet, Universitetssjukhuset, Linköping, 09:00
Opponent
Note

All or some of the partial works included in the dissertation are not registered in DIVA and therefore not linked in this post.

Available from: 2022-06-30 Created: 2022-06-30 Last updated: 2023-03-03Bibliographically approved
List of papers
1. Development of the 'Patient perspective On Care and Rehabilitation process' instrument (POCR)
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Development of the 'Patient perspective On Care and Rehabilitation process' instrument (POCR)
2002 (English)In: Aging Clinical and Experimental Research, ISSN 1594-0667, E-ISSN 1720-8319, Vol. 14, no 5, p. 402-411Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background and aims: There is a lack of instruments for assessing patient-perceived quality of care developed from a process perspective and also from theoretical concepts based on a patient perspective. The objective was to develop an instrument for following-up the care and rehabilitation process of the elderly from the patients' perspective. Methods: The present instrument, the "Patient perspective On Care and Rehabilitation process" (POCR), is based on a theoretical framework for the patients' evaluation of the care process, i.e., an instrument-construction reflecting that the patients' needs differed during the care process. The POCR contains two scales, one measures the fulfilment of needs and the other the importance of the fulfilment of needs. Data collection took place via telephone interviews. Results: A factor analysis based on 306 cases resulted in seven factors reflecting the different phases in the care process and with an explained variance of 60.8. Assessed by Cronbach's alpha coefficient, the internal consistency was 0.83 for the total importance scale and between 0.55-0.71 for each factor. Conclusions: The POCR is a valid, reliable and useful multidimensional instrument for measuring patient-perceived outcome of the care and rehabilitation process in the elderly. (C) 2002, Editrice Kurtis.

Keywords
care process, elderly, patient perspective, patient satisfaction, quality of care, POCR (Patient perspective On Care and Rehabilitation process)
National Category
Medical and Health Sciences
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-48692 (URN)
Available from: 2009-10-11 Created: 2009-10-11 Last updated: 2023-12-28

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Authority records

Krevers, Barbro

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Krevers, Barbro
By organisation
Division of PhysiotherapyFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences
Nursing

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

isbn
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

isbn
urn-nbn
Total: 43 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf