liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Learning and practicing more value-reflective, problem-setting health technology assessment: experiences and lessons from the VALIDATE project
Univ Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Radboud Univ Nijmegen Med Ctr, Netherlands.
Basque Fdn Hlth Innovat & Res, Spain.
Norwegian Univ Sci & Technol, Norway; Univ Oslo, Norway.
Show others and affiliations
2022 (English)In: International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, ISSN 0266-4623, E-ISSN 1471-6348, Vol. 38, no 1, article id e63Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Objectives To conduct a formative evaluation of applying the VALIDATE approach in practice by (i) assessing how students appreciated the e-learning course, (ii) exploring how, for what purposes and with what outcomes the acquired VALIDATE competences subsequently were used in internships in different institutional contexts, and how this was shaped by these contexts, and (iii) what this shows on real-world use of VALIDATE. Methods Comparative discussion of experiences of applying the VALIDATE approach via a semistructured survey and oral feedback from e-course students; final reports on internships in health technology assessment (HTA) practice, followed by semistructured interviews with interns and supervisors to complement and interpret results. Results All students considered the VALIDATE approach an enlightening and important addition to current HTA knowledge, especially regarding understanding the relation between empirical analysis and normative inquiry, identifying policy relevant questions and using the method of reconstructing interpretive frames for scoping. The latter appeared intellectually challenging and requiring some prior HTA knowledge. The use the VALIDATE approach in practice shows that interns productively redefined the HTA problem, based on appreciation of different stakeholders definition of the issue; they experienced constraints from retrieving all relevant perspectives from existing literature as well as from institutional rules and routines. Conclusions Some challenges in applying the VALIDATE approach deserve attention for its future use: currently used research approaches often assume a problem as "given"; and the data needed on different perspectives is often not reported in scientific literature. Finally, data gathering on and evaluation of value dimensions was experienced as challenging.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS , 2022. Vol. 38, no 1, article id e63
Keywords [en]
method; values; interpretation
National Category
Information Systems
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-187521DOI: 10.1017/S0266462322000204ISI: 000834350200001PubMedID: 35726526OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-187521DiVA, id: diva2:1690227
Note

Funding Agencies|Erasmus+ Programme of the European Union [2018-1-NL01-KA203-038960]

Available from: 2022-08-25 Created: 2022-08-25 Last updated: 2022-08-25

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Sandman, Lars
By organisation
Division of Society and HealthFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences
In the same journal
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care
Information Systems

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 40 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf