liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Adoption of Public e-services versus Civic Tech Services: On the Issue of Trust and Citizen Participation in Ukraine and Belarus
Dnipro University of Technology, Ukraine.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-3344-1497
Center for Advanced Internet Studies and Institute of Social Movements, Ruhr-University Bochum, Germany.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0087-5248
Linköping University, Department of Management and Engineering, Political Science. Linköping University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-6099-4252
2022 (English)In: Electronic Government, EGOV 2022, SPRINGER INTERNATIONAL PUBLISHING AG , 2022, Vol. 13391, p. 15-30Conference paper, Published paper (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

Belarus and Ukraine embarked on digitalisation relying on an international experience. Ukraine experienced difficulties in building infrastructure and connecting their regions and faced challenges in providing training and raising citizen awareness on advantages of the digital services. Yet, the digitalization reform proceeded from the principles of citizen-centeredness and e-participation. Belarus, on the contrary, was quick in building the basic infrastructure and training their public officials. However, the e-government was oriented rather on technical aspects and inter-sectoral communication, than on the needs of the citizens. Despite the differences in both cases, the level of trust, the basic prerequisite for the quality e-services, has been low (Ukraine) or non-existent (Belarus). This paper uses multi-method approach to examine citizen trust and their adoption of e-services in developing political or administrative regime contexts that are characterized by low trust, variable digital literacy, and variable access to information. A key finding is that in both countries it was the historical legacy of access to free services, that was one of the barriers to building a sustainable and reliable system of e-services. However, while Ukraine started to improve their infrastructure and building trust towards digital services during the COVID-19 pandemic, in Belarus the authorities’ ineffective management of the pandemic has led to sharp decrease in trust towards authorities. As a result, rudiments of an alternative system of public-services’ delivery, based on the people-to-people model, have been launched by the civil society.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
SPRINGER INTERNATIONAL PUBLISHING AG , 2022. Vol. 13391, p. 15-30
Series
Lecture Notes in Computer Science, ISSN 0302-9743, E-ISSN 1611-3349 ; 13391
Keywords [en]
citizen trust, e-Government, Ukraine, Belarus
National Category
Public Administration Studies
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-188988DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-15086-9_2ISI: 000874748500002ISBN: 9783031150852 (print)ISBN: 9783031150869 (electronic)OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-188988DiVA, id: diva2:1701510
Conference
21st IFIP WG 8.5 International Conference on Electronic Government (EGOV) / Conference on E-Democracy and Open Government Conference (CeDEM) / IFIP WG 8.5 International Conference on Electronic Participation (EPart), Linkoping, SWEDEN, SEP 06-08, 2022
Funder
Swedish Institute, 01072/2020
Note

Funding: Swedish Institute

Available from: 2022-10-06 Created: 2022-10-06 Last updated: 2022-12-16Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full text

Authority records

Gustafsson, Mariana S.

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Matveieva, OlgaNavumau, VasilGustafsson, Mariana S.
By organisation
Political ScienceFaculty of Arts and Sciences
Public Administration Studies

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
isbn
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
isbn
urn-nbn
Total: 128 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf