liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
A Meta-evaluation of Swedish Evaluations of COVID-19 Pandemic Management
Linköping University.
Linköping University, Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Division of Surgery, Orthopedics and Oncology. Linköping University, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences. Region Östergötland, Regionledningskontoret, Center for Disaster Medicine and Traumatology.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-1960-4261
Linköping University, Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Division of Surgery, Orthopedics and Oncology. Linköping University, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences. Region Östergötland, Regionledningskontoret, Center for Disaster Medicine and Traumatology.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-2771-2705
2022 (English)In: ISCRAM 2022 Conference Proceedings – 19th International Conference on Information Systems for Crisis Response and Management / [ed] Rob Grace; Hossein Baharmand, 2022, p. 349-361Conference paper, Published paper (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

The COVID-19 pandemic has had a global impact om society. Different countries and organizations have chosen different approaches to manage this crisis. This paper aims to describes how public Swedish actors (county administrative boards, municipalities, and regional councils) evaluated their management of the COVID-19 pandemic. Also, the paper aims to suggest improvements for crisis management strategies. Applying a meta-evaluation approach to open reports from the public organizations means collecting evaluation reports, determining if they fit the inclusion criteria, and if so, include them in the analysis. Included reports were categorized and given points indicating different types of merits. In addition, a thematic analysis of conclusions was conducted. 110 evaluation reports from 98 different organizations are included in the analysis. The importance of evaluating, having a structure for data collection, analysis, and reporting is reflected in the quality of the reports. Four identified themes offer an understanding of areas in need for development among Swedish regional councils, municipalities, and county administrative boards.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2022. p. 349-361
Series
ISCRAM Conference Proceedings, E-ISSN 2411-3387
Keywords [en]
COVID-19, crisis management, meta-evaluation
National Category
Social Sciences Interdisciplinary
Research subject
Disaster Medicine
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-190300ISBN: 9788284270999 (print)OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-190300DiVA, id: diva2:1715406
Conference
19th International Conference on Information Systems for Crisis Response and Management, Tarbes, France, May 22-25, 2022
Available from: 2022-12-01 Created: 2022-12-01 Last updated: 2022-12-07Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Paper at conference webpage

Authority records

Björnqvist, AntonBerggren, Peter

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Linhagen, AlvaBjörnqvist, AntonBerggren, Peter
By organisation
Linköping UniversityDivision of Surgery, Orthopedics and OncologyFaculty of Medicine and Health SciencesCenter for Disaster Medicine and Traumatology
Social Sciences Interdisciplinary

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

isbn
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

isbn
urn-nbn
Total: 135 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf