liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Episodes: coding and analyzing coherence in multiparty conversation
Linköping University, The Tema Institute. Linköping University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences.
Linköping University, Department of Culture and Communication. Linköping University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences.
1996 (English)In: Journal of Linguistics, ISSN 0022-2267, E-ISSN 1469-7742, Vol. 34, no 4, 799-831 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Episodes in Conversatum are topically and interactionally defined. They are boundaried sequences at a structually intermediate level, that is, above the level of utterance/turn but below that of the whofe encounter and its major phases. We argue that episodes and topics are equally basic tp conversations.

The initiation of a newepisode involes, per definition, the introtiuction of something new. On the oter hand, episode initiation.! are systematically dependent on lextual and contextual resorces that speakers take as given, when  - in the interaction - they guide their interlocutors into doing or talking about sornething new. This poper presents the fundamentals of a modef ofepisode structure and its relations to contextual resources. It also outlines a method, topical episode analysis, for coding and analyzing coherence in terms of episode structure in (especially mu!tiparty) conversation.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
1996. Vol. 34, no 4, 799-831 p.
National Category
Social Sciences
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-12872DOI: 10.1515/ling.1996.34.4.799OAI: diva2:17254
Available from: 2008-01-07 Created: 2008-01-07 Last updated: 2010-11-12Bibliographically approved
In thesis
1. Episodes in talk: Constructing coherence in multiparty conversation
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Episodes in talk: Constructing coherence in multiparty conversation
1998 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

This study contributes to an understanding of how coherence can be assigned or constructed by participants in authentic multiparty conversational interaction. Coherence is analysed as a type of organisation relevant for the making of meaning in situated interaction, but also in retrospect from a third party's (or analyst's) perspective; it is both constructed and reconstructed. Important questions are: what makes multiparty talk hold together, what do a number of participants in conversation (have to) do in order to sustain coherence, and in what senses can multiparty conversations be argued to be coherent?

A notion of episode is (re)introduced as a unit of natural social interaction, manifest at a structurally intermediate, or a global, level of conversation. The use of episode implies that coherence, a pragmatic phenomenon, steadily encompasses text, i.e. talk, context(s) and actions, and sense-making practices invoking contexts during the progression of interaction. This reflects the reciprocal relations between language, social interaction, and cognition. Also, a coding method of coherence has been developed, Topical Episode Analysis (abbreviated as TEA). The thesis explores the concept of episode and its place among units of interaction, and describes the episode structure and coherence-making in some specific activity types.

The empirical material used, 24 multiparty conversations making up a total of 1500 episodes, consists of dinner conversations among peers, multi-generational family gatherings (involving aphasics), radio talk shows, and conversations recorded at a centre aimed for elderly people (with symptoms of dementia). In all conversations, conversing is a main activity.

Both qualitative and quantitative analyses have been carried out. Results include the following points: (i) coherence in multiparty conversation can be regarded as a co-construction; (ii) coherence is accomplished through the invoking of contexts (context, situation, and background knowledge), implying that coherence is an attribute of activities in context and not only 'text'; (iii) coherence-making is the unmarked case in authentic conversation and incoherence or non-coherence appear to be theoretical constructs; (iv) coherence patterns are activity specific; (v) coherence is multilayered, consisting of one local and several global levels; (vi) coherence is constructed through a division of communicative labour, suggesting that also people with communicative impairments contribute to coherence-making.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Linköping: Linköping University Electronic Press, 1998. 138 p.
Linköping Studies in Arts and Science, ISSN 0282-9800 ; 171
Coherence, episode, context, multiparty conversation, activity type, communicative impairments, radio talk, dinner conversation
National Category
Social Sciences
urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-10517 (URN)91-7219-161-9 (ISBN)
Public defence
1998-02-27, Elysion, Hus T, Campus Valla, Linköpings Universitet, Linköping, 13:15 (English)
Available from: 2008-01-07 Created: 2008-01-07 Last updated: 2013-02-28Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Korolija, NataschaLinell, Per
By organisation
The Tema InstituteFaculty of Arts and SciencesDepartment of Culture and Communication
In the same journal
Journal of Linguistics
Social Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 190 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link