liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Diagnosis and classification of optic neuritis
UCL, England; Moorfields Eye Hosp, England; Amsterdam Univ Med Ctr, Netherlands.
Univ Sydney, Australia.
Univ Bern, Switzerland.
Al Amiri Hosp, Kuwait.
Show others and affiliations
2022 (English)In: Lancet Neurology, ISSN 1474-4422, E-ISSN 1474-4465, Vol. 21, no 12, p. 1120-1134Article, review/survey (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

There is no consensus regarding the classification of optic neuritis, and precise diagnostic criteria are not available. This reality means that the diagnosis of disorders that have optic neuritis as the first manifestation can be challenging. Accurate diagnosis of optic neuritis at presentation can facilitate the timely treatment of individuals with multiple sclerosis, neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder, or myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody-associated disease. Epidemiological data show that, cumulatively, optic neuritis is most frequently caused by many conditions other than multiple sclerosis. Worldwide, the cause and management of optic neuritis varies with geographical location, treatment availability, and ethnic background. We have developed diagnostic criteria for optic neuritis and a classification of optic neuritis subgroups. Our diagnostic criteria are based on clinical features that permit a diagnosis of possible optic neuritis; further paraclinical tests, utilising brain, orbital, and retinal imaging, together with antibody and other protein biomarker data, can lead to a diagnosis of definite optic neuritis. Paraclinical tests can also be applied retrospectively on stored samples and historical brain or retinal scans, which will be useful for future validation studies. Our criteria have the potential to reduce the risk of misdiagnosis, provide information on optic neuritis disease course that can guide future treatment trial design, and enable physicians to judge the likelihood of a need for long-term pharmacological management, which might differ according to optic neuritis subgroups.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC , 2022. Vol. 21, no 12, p. 1120-1134
National Category
Neurology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-191050DOI: 10.1016/S1474-4422(22)00200-9ISI: 000898849800022PubMedID: 36179757OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-191050DiVA, id: diva2:1727937
Note

Funding Agencies|YNT-Schering Fellowship

Available from: 2023-01-17 Created: 2023-01-17 Last updated: 2023-01-17

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Link, Yumin
By organisation
Division of NeurobiologyFaculty of Medicine and Health SciencesNeurologiska kliniken i Linköping
In the same journal
Lancet Neurology
Neurology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 151 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf