liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
The use of an e-learning module on return to work advice for physiotherapists – A prospective cohort study
Employee Health & Wellbeing Service, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
Allied Health Research Unit, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-7619-4054
Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Medicine, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7376-6793
Centre for Psychological Research, University of Derby, Derby, UK.
2018 (English)In: Physiotherapy Theory and Practice, ISSN 0959-3985, E-ISSN 1532-5040, Vol. 36, no 2, p. 267-275Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background:

Nonspecific low back pain (LBP) can progress to chronic disability and prolonged absence from work. Despite clinical and professional guidelines, physiotherapists often fail to address return to work outcomes.

Aims:

The aim of this exploratory study was to determine whether an e-learning resource tailored to physiotherapy practice could affect physiotherapists’ attitudes and beliefs regarding return to work advice for their patients.

Design:

A prospective interventional cohort study (pilot).

Methods:

Participants were recruited via the Chartered Society of Physiotherapy website. Responses on a clinical vignette, the Health Care Providers’ Pain and Impairment Scale (HC-Pairs), and the Behavioral Constructs Questionnaire (BCQ) were collected online at baseline (Q1) and 2-months post-intervention (Q2).

Results:

Fifty-four physiotherapists completed Q1 and the response rate for Q2 was 44/54 (81%). Changes in the degree of agreement with guidelines indicated that the intervention made an impact on respondents (kappa 0.345; p = 0.003). HC-Pairs and BCQ results showed a nonstatistically significant trend toward the target behavior.

Conclusions:

There is a need for interventions to improve adherence with advice for return to work following nonspecific LBP. An e-learning tool for physiotherapists on advising patients regarding return to work has potential to positively affect self-reported clinical behavior.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Taylor & Francis, 2018. Vol. 36, no 2, p. 267-275
Keywords [en]
Low back pain; case management; e-learning; guidelines; occupational health; return to work
National Category
Physiotherapy
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-192147DOI: 10.1080/09593985.2018.1485193ISI: 000526421100002PubMedID: 29924673Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85048748811OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-192147DiVA, id: diva2:1741458
Available from: 2023-03-06 Created: 2023-03-06 Last updated: 2023-03-17Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Divanoglou, Anestis

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Chance-Larsen, KennethDivanoglou, Anestis
In the same journal
Physiotherapy Theory and Practice
Physiotherapy

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 21 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf