Use and outcome of minimally invasive pancreatic surgery in the European E-MIPS registryVall dHebron Univ Hosp, Spain.
Ghent Univ Hosp, Belgium.
Radboud UMC, Netherlands.
Univ Pisa, Italy.
Sahlgrens Univ Hosp, Sweden.
Hosp Mar, Spain.
Hosp Mar, Spain; Careggi Univ Hosp, Italy.
Az Groeninge, Belgium.
Hosp Univ Doctor Peset, Spain.
Beaujon Hosp, France.
Hop Europeen Marseille, France.
Lokman Hekim Ankara Hosp, Turkiye.
OLVG, Netherlands.
Osped Niguarda Ca Granda, Italy.
Odense Univ Hosp, Denmark.
Paris Descartes Univ, France.
Erasmus MC, Netherlands.
Heidelberg Univ, Germany.
Moscow Clin Sci Ctr, Russia.
UKSH, Germany.
Univ Helsinki, Finland.
MST, Netherlands.
Catharina Hosp, Netherlands.
Hop Paul Brousse, France.
Med Univ Innsbruck, Austria.
UMC Utrecht, Netherlands; St Antonius Hosp, Netherlands.
Univ Strasbourg, France.
Antwerp Univ Hosp, Belgium.
Ctr Hosp Reg Orleans, France.
Hosp Santa Creu & Sant Pau, Spain.
UMC Utrecht, Netherlands; St Antonius Hosp, Netherlands.
Amphia Hosp, Netherlands.
Miguel Servet Univ Hosp, Spain.
Ctr Hosp Univ Montpellier, France.
Univ Hosp Virgen Victoria, Spain.
Azienda Osped Osped Riuniti Villa Sofia Cervello, Italy.
Univ Amsterdam, Netherlands; Canc Ctr Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Inst Fdn Poliambulanza, Italy; Univ Hosp Southampton NHS Trust, England.
Show others and affiliations
2023 (English)In: HPB, ISSN 1365-182X, E-ISSN 1477-2574, Vol. 25, no 4, p. 400-408Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]
Background: The European registry for minimally invasive pancreatic surgery (E-MIPS) collects data on laparoscopic and robotic MIPS in low-and high-volume centers across Europe.Methods: Analysis of the first year (2019) of the E-MIPS registry, including minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy (MIDP) and minimally invasive pancreatoduodenectomy (MIPD). Primary outcome was 90-day mortality.Results: Overall, 959 patients from 54 centers in 15 countries were included, 558 patients underwent MIDP and 401 patients MIPD. Median volume of MIDP was 10 (7-20) and 9 (2-20) for MIPD. Median use of MIDP was 56.0% (IQR 39.0-77.3%) and median use of MIPD 27.7% (IQR 9.7-45.3%). MIDP was mostly performed laparoscopic (401/558, 71.9%) and MIPD mostly robotic (234/401, 58.3%). MIPD was performed in 50/54 (89.3%) centers, of which 15/50 (30.0%) performed >= 20 MIPD annually. This was 30/ 54 (55.6%) centers and 13/30 (43%) centers for MIPD respectively. Conversion rate was 10.9% for MIDP and 8.4% for MIPD. Overall 90 day mortality was 1.1% (n = 6) for MIDP and 3.7% (n = 15) for MIPD.Conclusion: Within the E-MIPS registry, MIDP is performed in about half of all patients, mostly using laparoscopy. MIPD is performed in about a quarter of patients, slightly more often using the robotic approach. A minority of centers met the Miami guideline volume criteria for MIPD.
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
ELSEVIER SCI LTD , 2023. Vol. 25, no 4, p. 400-408
National Category
Surgery
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-195341DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2022.07.015ISI: 000981429400001PubMedID: 37028826OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-195341DiVA, id: diva2:1772245
2023-06-212023-06-212023-06-21