liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Evaluation of patient participation in relation to the implementation of a person-centered nursing shift handover
Uppsala Univ, Sweden; Uppsala Univ Hosp, Sweden.
Uppsala Univ, Sweden.
Karolinska Inst, Sweden.
Linköping University, Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Division of Nursing Sciences and Reproductive Health. Linköping University, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences. Uppsala Univ, Sweden.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-7737-169X
Show others and affiliations
2023 (English)In: Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing, ISSN 1545-102X, E-ISSN 1741-6787Article in journal (Refereed) Epub ahead of print
Abstract [en]

BackgroundIt has been suggested that nursing shift-to-shift handover should be a more team-based dialogue with and for the patient rather than about a patient. AimThe aim of this study was to evaluate patient participation in relation to the implementation of the person-centered handover (PCH). MethodA pretest-posttest design was used without a comparison group, including patients from nine units in a university hospital at pretest (n = 228) and after implementing PCH (posttest, n = 253) per the framework integrated-Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services. The PCH is inspired by an Australian bedside handover model. The Patient Preferences for the Patient Participation tool was used to rate the preference for and experience of participation on 12 items, combined into three levels of preference-based participation (insufficient-fair-sufficient). ResultsThere were no differences regarding experience or preference-based participation between patients at pretest-posttest; however, posttest patients experienced participation in the item Reciprocal communication to a lesser extent than the pretest patients. Only 49% of the posttest group received PCH; of those not receiving PCH, some would have wanted PCH (27%), while some would have declined (24%). Patients receiving PCH had sufficient participation (82%), to a greater extent, regarding the item Sharing ones symptoms with staff than patients at pretest (72%). Patients receiving PCH also had sufficient participation, to a greater extent, than patients at posttest who did not receive, but would have wanted PCH, regarding four items: (1) sharing ones symptoms with staff, (2) reciprocal communication, (3) being told what was done, and (4) taking part in planning. Linking evidence to actionMost patients want to be present at PCH. Therefore, nurses should ask for the patients preferences regarding PCH and act accordingly. Not inviting patients who want PCH could contribute to insufficient patient participation. Further studies are needed to capture what assistance nurses would want in identifying and acting in alignment with patient preferences.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
WILEY , 2023.
Keywords [en]
bedside handover; bedside handover report; patient participation; person-centered handover; preference-based participation; preferences
National Category
Nursing
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-196675DOI: 10.1111/wvn.12666ISI: 001022905100001PubMedID: 37431567OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-196675DiVA, id: diva2:1789241
Available from: 2023-08-18 Created: 2023-08-18 Last updated: 2023-08-18

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Eldh, Ann CatrineWenemark, Marika
By organisation
Division of Nursing Sciences and Reproductive HealthFaculty of Medicine and Health SciencesDivision of Society and HealthEnheten för folkhälsa
In the same journal
Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing
Nursing

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 30 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf