liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
System disruptions
We are currently experiencing disruptions on the search portals due to high traffic. We are working to resolve the issue, you may temporarily encounter an error message.
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Non-linear impact of natural resources, green financing, and energy transition on sustainable environment: A way out for common prosperity in NORDIC countries
Xinjiang Univ, Peoples R China.
Xinjiang Univ, Peoples R China.
Sunway Univ, Malaysia.
Linköping University, Department of Management and Engineering, Economics. Linköping University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences.
2023 (English)In: Resources policy, ISSN 0301-4207, E-ISSN 1873-7641, Vol. 83, article id 103683Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

In a couple of decades, the immense interest of scholars and policymakers is to identify the factors that support environmental sustainability without sacrificing economic well-being. Nordic countries with huge natural resource reserves are known as the top countries of the "European GDP per capita league table." However, with the lofty climate targets, these countries are still responsible for environmental impairments through their incessant contribution to the global energy supply network. Therefore, to defeat this predicament, the study investigates the role of natural resources (NTR), green finance (GFN), green energy (GEC), and economic growth (GDP) in Nordic countries from 1990 to 2018. The study employed the novel quantile-based econometrics approach of "Method of the Moments Quantile Regression" (MMQR), which provides the direction and magni-tude of the asymmetric association of NTR, GFN, GEC, and GDP with the ecological footprint. The results of this test revealed that the NTR and GDP have a significantly positive influence, while GEN and GEC have significantly negative associations with an ecological footprint across all quantiles. This has implied that green finance and green energy work as the solution, whereas natural resources and economic growth are key drivers of envi-ronmental degradation. Further, the "Augmented Mean Group" (AMG) and "Common Correlated Effect Mean Group" (CCEMG) are used as the robustness check, which endorsed the same association of NTR, GFN, GEC, and GDP with the EFP suggested by MMQR. Based on these findings, the study suggests policy implications for controlling the ecological footprint in Nordic countries.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
ELSEVIER SCI LTD , 2023. Vol. 83, article id 103683
Keywords [en]
Natural resources; Green finance; Green energy; Sustainable development; Common prosperity
National Category
Peace and Conflict Studies Other Social Sciences not elsewhere specified
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-196885DOI: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.103683ISI: 001013322500001OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-196885DiVA, id: diva2:1791510
Available from: 2023-08-25 Created: 2023-08-25 Last updated: 2025-02-20

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Uddin, Gazi Salah
By organisation
EconomicsFaculty of Arts and Sciences
In the same journal
Resources policy
Peace and Conflict StudiesOther Social Sciences not elsewhere specified

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 18 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf