liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Comparing Blood Loss Estimates by Medical Laypeople in Online and In-person Formats using SABLE
Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA.
Linköping University, Department of Computer and Information Science, Human-Centered systems. Region Östergötland, Regionledningskontoret, Center for Disaster Medicine and Traumatology. Linköping University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences.
Linköping University, Department of Computer and Information Science, Human-Centered systems. Linköping University, Faculty of Science & Engineering.
Linköping University, Department of Computer and Information Science, Human-Centered systems. Linköping University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences. Region Östergötland, Regionledningskontoret, Center for Disaster Medicine and Traumatology.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5943-0679
2021 (English)In: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, Sage Publications, 2021, Vol. 65, p. 1352-1356Conference paper, Published paper (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

To design interventions for teaching laypeople how to respond in hemorrhage situations, it is necessary to understand factors that influence their perception of blood loss. Although lab-based research offers more experimental control, it limits access to certain kinds of participants. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to compare results from an online administration of a web-based application (SABLE) to data collected using the same application in a lab. Participants viewed 78 5-second video clips of simulated bleeding injuries with a male or female victim and different volumes of blood loss. They estimated the volume of blood loss after each video. The results replicated the general findings from prior research and revealed no significant differences in estimations or estimation accuracy between the online and lab-based administration of SABLE. Results are discussed in terms of applicability to research practice. 

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Sage Publications, 2021. Vol. 65, p. 1352-1356
Series
Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, ISSN 1071-1813, E-ISSN 2169-5067 ; 65
National Category
Applied Psychology
Research subject
Disaster Medicine
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-197353DOI: 10.1177/1071181321651247Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85171286745OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-197353DiVA, id: diva2:1793554
Conference
The Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting
Available from: 2023-09-01 Created: 2023-09-01 Last updated: 2024-09-10

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Friberg, MarcLantz Cronqvist, MattiasPrytz, Erik

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Friberg, MarcLantz Cronqvist, MattiasPrytz, Erik
By organisation
Human-Centered systemsCenter for Disaster Medicine and TraumatologyFaculty of Arts and SciencesFaculty of Science & Engineering
Applied Psychology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 50 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf