liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Placing patient-reported outcomes at the centre of cardiovascular clinical practice: implications for quality of care and management A statement of the ESC Association of Cardiovascular Nursing and Allied Professions (ACNAP), the Association for Acute CardioVascular Care (ACVC), European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI), European Association of Preventive Cardiology (EAPC), Heart Failure Association (HFA), European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA), European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging (EACVI), ESC Regulatory Affairs Committee, ESC Advocacy Committee, ESC Digital Health Committee, ESC Education Committee, and the ESC Patient Forum
KU Leuven Univ Leuven, Belgium; Univ Gothenburg, Sweden; Univ Cape Town, South Africa.
Haukeland Hosp, Norway; Univ Bergen, Norway.
Univ Barcelona, Spain; Inst Invest August Pi I Sunyer IDIBAPS, Spain; Ctr Invest Biomed Red Enfermedades Cardiovasc CIBE, Spain.
Odense Univ Hosp, Denmark; Univ Southern Denmark, Denmark.
Show others and affiliations
2023 (English)In: European Heart Journal, ISSN 0195-668X, E-ISSN 1522-9645Article in journal (Refereed) Epub ahead of print
Abstract [en]

Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) provide important insights into patients own perspectives about their health and medical condition, and there is evidence that their use can lead to improvements in the quality of care and to better-informed clinical decisions. Their application in cardiovascular populations has grown over the past decades. This statement describes what PROs are, and it provides an inventory of disease-specific and domain-specific PROs that have been developed for cardiovascular populations. International standards and quality indices have been published, which can guide the selection of PROs for clinical practice and in clinical trials and research; patients as well as experts in psychometrics should be involved in choosing which are most appropriate. Collaborations are needed to define criteria for using PROs to guide regulatory decisions, and the utility of PROs for comparing and monitoring the quality of care and for allocating resources should be evaluated. New sources for recording PROs include wearable digital health devices, medical registries, and electronic health record. Advice is given for the optimal use of PROs in shared clinical decision-making in cardiovascular medicine, and concerning future directions for their wider application.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
OXFORD UNIV PRESS , 2023.
Keywords [en]
Health status; Measurement; Patient experiences; Patient-reported outcomes; Quality of life
National Category
Nursing
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-197419DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehad514ISI: 001053595600001PubMedID: 37606064OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-197419DiVA, id: diva2:1794400
Available from: 2023-09-05 Created: 2023-09-05 Last updated: 2023-09-29

Open Access in DiVA

The full text will be freely available from 2024-08-22 00:00
Available from 2024-08-22 00:00

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Jaarsma, Tiny
By organisation
Division of Nursing Sciences and Reproductive HealthFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences
In the same journal
European Heart Journal
Nursing

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 8 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf